From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Is DOS unix? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 05:51:10 GMTPeter Flass writes:
from pg. 5, GH20-0859, CP-67/CMS User's Guide (this particular manual is only 1969). note that between cp-67/cms and vm370/cms ... "cms" was changed from "cambridge monitor system" to "conversational monitor system" and the primary "personal" disk was changed from the p-disk to the a-disk.
device virt. symbolic device number addr name type ---- --- ---- ------- 1052 009 CON1 console 2540 00C RDR1 card reader 2540 00D PUN1 card punch 1403 00E PRN1 line printer 231x 190 DSK1 s-disk (system files) 231x 191 DSK2 p-disk (user files) 231x 192 DKS3 t-disk (workspace) 231x --- DSK4 a-disk (user files) 231x --- DSK5 b-disk (user files) 231x 19C DSK6 c-disk 2400 180 TAP1 tape drive 2400 181 TAP2 tape drive--
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The BASIC Variations Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.misc,alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:29:29 GMTerewhon@nowhere.com (J French) writes:
some old PC prices from SJMN (slightly later than the 386sx intro)
... one of the reasons i was regularly posting this was that some of
the boca business cases for PS2s that I saw didn't take into the
account any reality from what was happening with PC-clone street
prices.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#79 a.f.c history checkup... (was What specifications will the standard year 2001 PC have?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#80 a.f.c history checkup... (was What specifications will the standard year 2001 PC have?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#81 a.f.c history checkup... (was What specifications will the standard year 2001 PC have?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#82 a.f.c history checkup... (was What specifications will the standard year 2001 PC have?)
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:20:13 GMTjmfbahciv writes:
basically the hi-tech boom/bubble wouldn't have had the large explosion of high tech workers w/o all the people from foreign countries. the hi-tech boom/bubble requirements coupled with the y2k remediation effort requirements exceeded resources available in the US ... and a large amount of the y2k remediation was outsourced overseas (wasn't as much a cost issue ... as the resources just weren't otherwise available).
the problem was that with the completion of most of the y2k remediation work and the bursting of the hi-tech bubble ... there was significant reduction in resource requirements ... but at the same time the overseas outsourcing business relationship (forged in large part because of the y2k remediation requirements) didn't just evaporate. note that y2k remediation typically didn't involve any of the glamor stuff in the hi-tech bubble ... it did involve a lot of legacy stuff that is the nuts & bolts of many business operations.
once overseas outsourcing demonstrated expertise/skill in the boring effort of supporting the nuts & bolts of legacy business operation (as part of y2k remediation) ... it wasn't likely those resources were going to be totally discarded/ignored.
misc. related past threads:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#45 How will current AI/robot stories play when AIs are real?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#28 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#31 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#45 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#55 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#67 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#71 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#81 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#85 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#28 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003l.html#29 Offshore IT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003l.html#56 Offshore IT ... again?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003p.html#33 [IBM-MAIN] NY Times editorial on white collar jobs going
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Two subjects: 64-bit OS2/eCs, Innotek Products Newsgroups: alt.os.development,comp.arch,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer.misc Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:33:12 GMTKeith R. Williams writes:
there was some reference/joke about DoJ order to produce some set of the documents ... and there was some explanation about the very large number of box cars that would have to be scheduled just to transport them to DC.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Comments wanted on an authentication protocol Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:47:42 GMTJohan Lindh writes:
there have also been kerberos pk-init to use public key signature in place of shared-secret/password ... and various kinds of radius implementations that support public key signature for authentication.
ietf draft discussing key lengths and some time/execution:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-orman-public-key-lengths-07.txt
pk-init ... or "public key cryptography for initial authentication in
kerberos":
http://www.ietf.cnri.reston.va.us/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-cat-kerberos-pk-init-17.txt
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: small bit of cp/m & cp/67 trivia from alt.folklore.computers n.g. (thread) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vmesa-l Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 00:34:43 -0700discussion was how much (if any) did DOS inherit from CMS ... by way of CP/M
the following reference was posted indicating that at least the name
CP/M came from CP/67:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071011100440/http://www.khet.net/gmc/docs/museum/en_cpmName.html
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive workloads Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:18:10 GMT"Rod Burt" writes:
misc. past amadeus refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#49 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#50 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#76 Other oddball IBM System 360's ?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#67 unix
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003n.html#47 What makes a mainframe a mainframe?
some drift into other threads regarding airline reservation systems:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#29 Mainframes & Unix
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#20 Competitors to SABRE?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#69 Block oriented I/O over IP
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#74 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#45 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#2 Computers in Science Fiction
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#3 Why are Mainframe Computers really still in use at all?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#43 IBM doing anything for 50th Anniv?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#83 Summary: Robots of Doom
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#30 difference between itanium and alpha
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003o.html#17 Rationale for Supercomputers
mentioned in the above ... at one time we were asked to look at routes ... typically 2nd biggest app in res-system (after fares). they had a list of ten impossible things that they couldn't do.
one of the issues was that lots of the transactions were quite trivial, had very archaic query syntax and the agent frequently had to string together a whole series of such queries for a typical operation.
part of the work was an outgrowth of the work we had done on ha/cmp
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#hacmp
and cluster scale-up
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/95.html#13 SSA
slightly related
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#52 loosely-coupled, supercomputers, electronic commerce, etc
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive workloads Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:40:38 GMT"Rod Burt" writes:
... out of some box from the basement:
Amadeus Global Distribution System 24 April 1987
215pgs.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Mars Rover Not Responding Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.distributed,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.object,comp.programming,comp.theory,sci.physics Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 21:44:36 GMT"A. G. McDowell" writes:
we set up a test matrix ... not for the software ... but for the service. nominal payment infrastructure trouble desk did 5 minute problem first level problem determination ... however that was for an infrastructure that was almost exclusively circuit based.
while it was possible to translate the (payment) message formats from a circuit-based infrastructure to a packet-based infrastructure ... translating the circuit-based service operation to a packet-based infrastructure was less clear cut (merchant/webhost complains that payments aren't working ... expects internet/packet connection to be much less expensive than direct circuit ... but at the same time expects comparable availability).
The claim has been that coding for a service operation is 4-10 times that of a straight application implementation and ten times the effort because of needing to understand all possible failure modes ... regardless of whether they are characteristic of the software or hardware or some totally unrelated environmental characteristic.
in any case, one of the issues was detailed analysis of existing trouble desk circuit-based problem determination procedures and being able to translate that into a packet-based (internet) environment and still attempt to come close to the goal of being able to perform first level problem determination in five minutes. When we started there were cases of trouble ticket being closed NTF (no trouble found) after 3hrs of manual investigation.
of course this was also at a time ... when it was difficult to find any ISP that even knew how to spell service level agreement.
aka ... it is possible for software to perform flawlessly and still be useless.
some of this came from doing ha/cmp
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#hacmp
misc. related past threads
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000g.html#50 Egghead cracked, MS IIS again
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#48 Where are IBM z390 SPECint2000 results?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#75 Test and Set (TS) vs Compare and Swap (CS)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#18 HP-UX will not be ported to Alpha (no surprise)exit
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#85 The demise of compaq
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#91 Buffer overflow
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#93 Buffer overflow
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#28 Buffer overflow
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#29 Buffer overflow
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#73 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#24 Computers in Science Fiction
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#11 Why did OSI fail compared with TCP-IP?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#12 Why did OSI fail compared with TCP-IP?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#11 Wanted: the SOUNDS of classic computing
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#53 Microsoft worm affecting Automatic Teller Machines
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#62 IBM says AMD dead in 5yrs ... -- Microsoft Monopoly vs. IBM
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#15 A Dark Day
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003l.html#49 Thoughts on Utility Computing?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003p.html#37 The BASIC Variations
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A hundred subjects: 64-bit OS2/eCs, Innotek Products, ... Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,alt.os.development,comp.arch,comp.os.os2.misc Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:02:29 GMTglen herrmannsfeldt writes:
i believe the original SS circumstance started out with something like 40 people were paying in for each person drawing out (the rates somewhat were set so that money coming in somewhat matched the money going out ... typical pay as you go plan).
with declining birth rate, more people living until 65, more people living longer after 65, more people starting to collect before 65, ... the number of people receiving SS is growing much faster than the growth in the number of people paying in.
I've heard projected for something like 3 people paying in for each person drawing (i.e. number of people receiving money grew at least 10 times faster than the growth in the number of people paying in).
one discussion relating SS to the savings & loan situation:
http://www.ieg.ee/keith/docs/welfare/pensions.htm
a rather detailed discussion of the savings & loan situation
and carrying off-book gov. obligations:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aepay3.htm#riskm
don't let the start of the above posting about relationships between risk management and information security throw you off ... it eventually gets into some specifics of the savings & loan off-book fed gov. obligation equivalent to $100k for every person in the country.
the following has some numbers about SS being a pay as you go plan
... aka it isn't "fully funded" pension plan in that the money i'm
paying in is not being banked ... it is being used to pay current
SS beneficiaries:
http://www.ssab.gov/NEW/Publications/Financing/actionshouldbetaken.pdf
in 2001, 154 million workers paying & covered by SS ... and about 45
million people (one out of every 6 americans) are receiving benefits
(almost 3 to 1).
in 2001, there was $604 billion paid into SS and $439 billion was
being paid out. SS accounts for 24 percent of total Fed. gov. spending
and 23 percent of total Fed. gov. receipts.
by 2030, 20 percent of the population is expected to be age 65 or over
(compared to 12 percent in 2001).
chart 5 shows 5.1 workers per SS beneficiary in 1960, dropping to 1.9
workers per beneficiary by 2075 (doesn't show SS starting out with
something like 40 workers per beneficiary)
....
about a month or so ago there were some articles about the steel industry and its pay as you go pension plan (not fully funded) ... significantly contributing to bankruptcies (i.e. a significant part of the cost of steel from US companies goes to pay pensions of current beneficiaries).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Mars Rover Not Responding Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.distributed,comp.lang.java,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.object,comp.programming,comp.theory,sci.physics Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:01:49 GMT"A. G. McDowell" writes:
for 40 years or more, batch systems have tended to provide relatively clear diagnostic information for the application owner ... since the application owner wasn't around went their program ran; one specificly clearly diagnosed & reported item for those 40 some year period has been space full condition.
interactive platforms have tended to be much more laissez-faire about providing diagnostics for such things. i've seen payroll application ported from batch platfrom to an interactive oriented platform ... where the sort would fail because of space full condition ... but the error didn't get propagated appropriately thru the rest of the infrastructure. As a result, checks got printed ... but not with exactly the values expected. some post mortem analysis seemed to indicate that assumptions were made about individual applications indicating interactive error message to an human in attendance ... and the human taking the appropriate action.
now some number of the batch platforms for possibly 20 years now ... have had facilities that could take advantage of batch paradigm error infrastructure and for conditions like space full ... take automated prescriped graceful recovery actions (i.e. there is deadline for getting checks out and can't rely on the vagaries of being able to count on some human based mediation).
some fundamental issue about not only trying to turn out perfect code ... but also providing an instrumented infrastructure that recognizes errors will probably happen ... and in the absence of direct human mediation ... other types of facilities need to be provided (frequently a characteristic differentiation between batch-oriented platforms and interactive-oriented platforms).
some random posts on batch vis-a-vis interactive paradigms
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#8 Why Do Mainframes Exist ???
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#4 VSE or MVS
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#18 Reviving the OS/360 thread (Questions about OS/360)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#51 Mainframes suck? (was Re: Possibly OT: Disney Computing)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#16 Old Computers
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#197 Computing As She Really Is. Was: Re: Life-Advancing Work of Timothy Berners-Lee
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#81 Ux's good points.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#83 Ux's good points.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#58 360 Architecture, Multics, ... was (Re: X86 ultimate CISC? No.)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#71 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#14 HP-UX will not be ported to Alpha (no surprise)exit
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#4 mainframe question
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#90 Buffer overflow
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#1 The demise of compaq
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#24 Buffer overflow
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#37 Playing Cards was Re: looking for information on the IBM 7090
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#73 Where did text file line ending characters begin?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#41 Home mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#0 Home mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#14 Home mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002p.html#54 Newbie: Two quesions about mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#11 PDP10 and RISC
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#56 The figures of merit that make mainframes worth the price
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#46 Fast TCP
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003n.html#46 What makes a mainframe a mainframe?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004.html#40 AMD/Linux vs Intel/Microsoft
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004.html#41 AMD/Linux vs Intel/Microsoft
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004.html#43 [Fwd: Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive w
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004.html#47 Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive workloads
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Is 3DES more secure than 384 bit RSA? Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 14:42:29 GMT"JG" writes:
from above:
System requirement Symmetric RSA or DH DSA subgroup for attack key size modulus size size resistance (bits) (bits) (bits) (bits) 70 70 947 129 80 80 1228 148 90 90 1553 167 100 100 1926 186 150 150 4575 284 200 200 8719 383 250 250 14596 482--
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: pointless embedded systems Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 01:18:44 GMTKeith R. Williams writes:
2741 came in standard and PTTC/EBCD
cp67 would attempt to dynamically determine type on initial connection by translating input to EBCDIC using PTTC/EBCD translate table ... assuming input was login command and check for L/l. If wasn't L/l, it would check for Y/y (which was what correspondence L/l translated to) ... and then retranslate with the correspondence translate table.
PTTC/EBCD 2741 top row was:
< ; : % ' > * ( ) _ +
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - &
2nd row had single key between P and the return key which
had at-sign as lower case and cent-sign as upper case.
CMS standard editing convention was based on PTTC/EBCD since it had at-sign for character delete and cent-sign (upper case at-sign) as line-delete (i.e. upper and lower case of the key between the P and the return key on the 2nd row).
standard/correspondence 2741 top row was:
X ' # $ % X & * ( ) _ +
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - =
X - upper case 1 was a combined minus/plus character
X - upper case 6 was cent-sign
2nd row key between the P and the return was ! (lower-case) and degree-symbol (upper-case)
My first home terminal was "portable" 2741 (two 40lb suitcases) in March of 1970 ... later that year it was replaced with a regular 2741.
past posts on blip:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000g.html#12 360 Architecture, Multics, ... was (Re: X86 ultimate CISC? No.)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#56 wrt code first, document later
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#71 Early attempts at console humor?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#72 Early attempts at console humor?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#16 Early attempts at console humor?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#18 Early attempts at console humor?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003m.html#39 S/360 undocumented instructions?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003m.html#40 MAD Programming Language
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003o.html#28 When nerds were nerds
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004.html#17 Holee shit! 30 years ago!
past PTTC/EBCD posts
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001.html#15 IBM Model Numbers (was: First video terminal?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#62 ASR33/35 Controls
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#21 IBM Selectric as printer
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#1 cp/67 35th anniversary
some CTSS 2741 refs:
https://www.multicians.org/mga.html#2741
https://www.multicians.org/terminals.html
some of the CTSS people went to Multics on 5th floor of 545 tech sq.
and some showed up at the science center on 4th floor of 545 tech
sq (where cp-67/cms was done). misc. other 545 tech sq. refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#545tech
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The BASIC Variations Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 05:12:50 GMTBrian Inglis writes:
Boyd says that it reached a point where finally the one-star called a meeting in the auditorium and publicly fired boyd. however, a four-star shortly there-after called a meeting in the same auditorium (with all the same attendees) and rehired Boyd and told the one-star to never do that again.
misc. boyd posts:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subboyd.html#boyd
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The BASIC Variations Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:32:11 GMTbv@wjv.comREMOVE (Bill Vermillion) writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: harddisk in space Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.distributed,comp.programming,comp.theory,sci.physics Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 19:17:50 GMTrobertwessel2@yahoo.com (Robert Wessel) writes:
misc. minor past refs to air bearing simulation work for floating,
thin-film heads being done on the 195 in bldg. 28:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#30 Weird
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#63 Help me find pics of a UNIVAC please
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#74 They Got Mail: Not-So-Fond Farewells
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#51 Disk drives as commodities. Was Re: Yamhill
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#52 Disk drives as commodities. Was Re: Yamhill
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#69 Multics Concepts For the Contemporary Computing World
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003m.html#20 360 Microde Floating Point Fix
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003n.html#45 hung/zombie users ... long boring, wandering story
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004.html#21 40th anniversary of IBM System/360 on 7 Apr 2004
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 23:33:41 GMTjmfbahciv writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Seriously long term storage Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:13:49 GMT"Nico de Jong" writes:
a number of pictures of selectric w/dates and adds:
http://www.etypewriters.com/history.htm
also there was a mag-tape selectric ... tapes looked something like
3480/3490 cartridge .. i still have one that (i believe still
possibly) has some pages I typed up for Atlantic City share presentation,
fall 1968 ... (fortunately i also still had paper copy in
some files):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/94.html#18 CP/67 & OS MFT14
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Seriously long term storage Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:27:28 GMTPete Verdon writes:
punch cards were much earlier vintage (1890) ... and were also used for a lot of purposes that general/consumer public would have encounterd ... like sense-mark versions ... that people would fill-in for various kinds of registration. shipping made use of them also ... with punch card enclosed in the package. there were all those don't spindle, fold or mutilate warnings for the general/consumer public ... which has passed into more general cultural use.
some punch card description:
http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/cards/
"do not fold, spindle or mutilate", a cultural history of the punch card:
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/slubar/fsm.html
a little more retrospective ... viruses in the '60s (people
changing punch holes in their cards):
http://www.melbpc.org.au/pcupdate/9606/9606article8.htm
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Worst case scenario? Newsgroups: comp.arch Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:31:22 GMT"Del Cecchi" writes:
we actually did some consulting for Steve when he showed up as the CTO of another company 6-7 years ago.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: ARPAnet guest accounts, and longtime email addresses Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 21:52:46 GMTYeechang Lee writes:
i had email at csc (4th floor of 545 tech. sq .... mit multics was on the 5th floor) ... and got a home terminal in march of 1970 ... and pretty much have had home online access continuously since then.
recent home terminal reference:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004b.html#12
various past postings on internal network, arpanet, internet:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/internet.htm
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#internet
i did have lynn@netcom.com (shell account) starting in 1993 .... but that was expired when earthlink.net bought netcom.com (or maybe it was after earthlink.net had bought mindspring which had previously bought netcom.com but not discontinued the shell accounts).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A hundred subjects: 64-bit OS2/eCs, Innotek Products, ... Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,alt.os.development,comp.arch,comp.os.os2.misc Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 00:34:02 GMT"Stephen Fuld" writes:
401k (deductions) tends to come out of before-tax income (i.e. it is tax deductable) ... and then later when you take the proceeds it is part of gross income for tax purposes.
SS deductions aren't tax deductable at the time they are paid and the benefits aren't tax deductable at the time they are received. based on that, one could claim that the SS deductions and the SS benefits aren't directly related (they tax it when they take from you and they tax again when they give it back?). SS deductions are just part of federal taxes ... but under different name ... and SS benefits just happen to use similar name.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Hardware issues [Re: Floating point required exponent range?] Newsgroups: comp.arch Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 14:54:36 GMTAndi Kleen writes:
intel had gone thru various rounds of including strong authentication
in the chip itself. current round has much of it moved out into
separate chip on the motherboard. recent article on the subject:
http://www.securitypipeline.com/17602019;jsessionid=IYLU5NK2LDPEGQSNDBCCKHQ
this isn't how much is it used ... but is the integrity of the infastructure based on it.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Health care and lies Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 15:21:31 GMT"J. Clarke" writes:
i've been at a number of rotan presentations .... searching for
references on the web ... turned of this discussion of propulsion
technology
http://www.avg-aerospace.com/html/access_to_space.html
another referenced turned up by search engine
http://www.hobbyspace.com/AAdmin/archive/RLV/1999/RLVNews1999-04-08.html
in hsdt ...
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#hsdt
we had a transponder on bird going up on 41-d ... so got to go to
launch party and sit in vip stands for 41-d launch (one of the guys
that had been on the moon was a couple seats over):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000b.html#27 Tysons Corner, Virginia
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#29 IBM 3725 Comms. controller - Worth saving?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003k.html#14 Ping: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
random past shuttle threads:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#24 BA Solves Y2K (Was: Re: Chinese Solve Y2K)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#94 Those who do not learn from history...
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002p.html#28 Western Union data communications?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#33 Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#34 Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#42 Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#47 Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#48 Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#54 Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#2 Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 22:35:49 GMTBernd Felsche writes:
collection of boyd refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subboyd.html#boyd
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Who is the most likely to use PK? Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:37:18 GMTdsr writes:
just that the transaction/message is digitally signed with private key. the corresponding public key can be registered with the financial institution ... in much the same way that PINs or *mother's maiden name* is registered.
to some extent, there was transition from x.509 identity certificates to relying-party-only certificates in the mid-90s because of the privacy information leakage problem. however, even these certificates contained at minimum an account number and could still allow the privacy information leakage described.
the design point for PKI certificates was to handle offline-email (from the early '80s, dialup, exchange email, hangup) between parties that previously had no communication. W/o being online and having no previous communication ... there was requirement for offline authentication.
one issue with account number is that there are possibly dozens of
business processes that require the account number. some discussions
of problems with protecting account numbers by hiding:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#61
and completely blanketing the earth in mile deep encryption won't
address all the problems.
the requirement given the x9a10 working group was to preserve the
integrity of the financial infrastructure for all electronic
retail payments:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/x959.html#x959
which changed the paradigm from hiding the number (which was recognized to be effectively impossible) to requiring that account numbers in x9.59 transactions could not be used in non-authenticated transactions (i.e. even with total public disclosier of the account number, it could not be used in fraudulent, non-authenticated transactions).
one of the issues was that the payment card industry started to make the transaction from offline, physical authentication to online, electronic authentication in the 70s ... and totally bypassed the intermediate step (reprsented by certificates) of offline, and electronic. I gave a presentation in the mid-90s that the use of certificates in online payment transactions represented a fall-back in state-of-the-art of nearly 30 years to pre-70s.
misc. past threads regarding relying-party-only certificates
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subpubkey.html#rpo
which, in part evolved, in order to address serious privacy information leakage problem (with traditional x.509 identity certificates)... along with assertion that in any form of online environmeht with relying-party-only certificates, the certificates are redundant and superfluous.
The redudnant and superfluous issue is, in part, becuase the certificates represent stale, static, copy of some information in a database. in an online transaction of any value ... not only would there be desire to reference stale, static type of data (including data that might not be included in a certificate because of privacy leakage issues) ... but also aggregated and timely information (like credit balance). If the online database can register lots of information, then it can also register an account's public key.
If other than no-value transation is involved and recourse to online database is required ... then that online database not only contains a superset of stale, static information (of the kind that might be found in a certificate, including stale, static information not found in a certificate because of privacy concerns) but also aggregated and timely information (credit balance, pattern of previous transactions, etc). Given recourse to online database containing a superset of any information in that might be contained in a stale, static certificate, then the stale, static certificate becomes redundant and superfluous.
misc. other refs on risks, fraud, exploits:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subintegrity.html#fraud
and assurance
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subintegrity.html#assurance
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: determining memory size Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vmesa-l Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:05:06 -0700At 9:43:26, 8 feb 2004, richgr@panix.com wrote:
However, before getting very far, it turned out there was a microcode bug on the 370/125. The early vm/370 boot procedure had been changed to use 370 MVCL to both clear memory and test for memory size. The problem was a change between 360/370 for standard instructions and the new 370 long instructions. The standard 360/370 would take the address, add the length and abort the instruction if (all four of) the origin and destination starting and ending addresses weren't available. The new long instructions would specified to incrementally execute a byte at a time w/o testing the ending address. The 370/125 had a bug in the MVCL since it added the length to the starting address and pre-tested the ending address. The VM/370 boot MVCL had starting address just after the boot routine for a length of 16mbytes and expected the boot MVCL to fail at end-of-storage (w/o wrapping storage). VM/370 was expecting the registers after the addressing interrupting on the boot MVCL to indicate end of storage, but the 370/125 microcode bug resulted in it not executing at all.
Note that this was different problem than having full 16mbytes of real storage and having the MVCL wrap w/o taking an addressing interrupt.
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: updated merged (security) taxonomy & glossary Newsgroups: comp.security.misc Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 21:16:11 GMTin the past month or so i've updated the merged security taxonomy and glossary
I've also updated the merged privacy taxonomy and glossary with
terms from the EU data privacy directive
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/privacy.htm
and the merged taxonomy taxonomy and glossary with terms from the
UN drugs and crime money laundering glossary:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/financial.htm
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Methods of Authentication on a Corporate Newsgroups: comp.security.misc Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 21:43:41 GMTnickowen@yahoo.com (Nick Owen) writes:
match on card biometrics come in a number of forms ....
1) standard cards that are inserted into readers where the readers contain the fingerprint reader. For 7816 contact cards in high traffic areas ... the reader can subject to wear & tear on both the contacts as well as the fingerprint sensor.
2) sensor on the card ... but the conversion of the fingerprint to digital template form is done by a chip in the reader and then the result is sent back to the card for matching against the template. some possibility that these could be 14443/contactless if there is enuf bandwidth. sensor on the card and contactless eliminates many of the failure points in distributed stations/readers.
3) sensor on the card ... and the conversion of the fingerprint to digital template form is done by chip in the card (and the match is performed based on template on the card). this is less likely to be contactless because of the power requirements to reduce fingerprint to digital form.
Note when the biometric sensor and chip is part of PDA with its own power source ... there is less of a issue about where the power for the operation needs to come from ... and interface to station can be wireless ... also eliminating lots of distributed station/reader failure modes.
basically the authentication taxonomy
• something you have
• something you know
• something you are
you can have one-factor, two-factor, and/or three-factor
authentication. something you know and something you are both can
either be
• shared-secret based (where the information is recorded in some database) or • non-shared-secret based ... where it is possible to proove that the information has been validated w/o having to transmit that information)
there is further issue with biometrics .... quite a few of the biometric infrastructures have fixed scoring values. bioemtrics tend to be a fuzzy reading (possibly several readings) of some biometric value which is digitized and recorded as a template. Some time later a new reading of the biometric is taken and a fuzzy match is made against a recorded template. A scoring threshold may be set whether the match is accepted or not. For some situations, the scoring threshhold might be on the order of 10-15 percent match. Various fixed scoring threshholds can lead to false positives (i.e. accepting incorrect matches) and false negatives (rejecting correct matches).
Another issue is that some biometrics can be more subject to environmental conditions ... like fingerprints can work better in a white collar office environment than, say, in a car repair/maint. garage.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 21:59:14 GMTCharles Richmond writes:
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A POX on you, Dennis Ritchie!!! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:58:29 GMTTorfinn Ingolfsen writes:
misc. haskel refs:
http://www.haskell.org/
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/hudak94haskell.html
http://www.galoisconnections.com/HCSPage1.htm
http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/franka/lang ... compilers & interpreters
http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~jl/
http://www.xoltar.org/2003/aug/04/haskellConcise.html
http://www.lns.cornell.edu/spr/2001-03/msg0031792.html
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2002-January/079394.html
http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/mail-www/haskell/msg00743.html
http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~mpj/pubs/springschool.html
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: determining memory size Newsgroups: bit.listserv.vmesa-l Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:57:56 -0700On 9 Feb 2004 11:23:54, Gerard Schildberger wrote:
one of the original links in the internal network was between cambridge and endicott. this was a project to modify CP/67 in two stages:
This setup was running a year before endicott had the first 370/145 engineering model with virtual memory operational. CP/67-i was used as the initial boot test on this machine (which had a knife switch as an ipl button). It initially crashed and wouldn't boot. It turns out that the engineers had gotton the implementation of two of the new "B2" opcodes backwards. CP/67-I was patched to reversed the "B2" opcode use (to correspond to the implementation mistake) and it then ran successfully.
In any case, this was somewhat the environment that early vm/370 work went on. While CMS was relatively unmodified in the CP/67 to VM/370 transition (other than the name change from cambridge monitor system to conversational monitor system), the CP kernel was significantly rewritten.
In any case, all the early vm/370 development was either under cp/67-h on a real 360/67 or eventually on a 370/145 under cp/67-i.
The issue is say you have vm/370 running in a 4mbyte virtual machine on a 512kbyte real machine (with other work going on).... if vm/370 boot/ipl was actually clearing 4mbytes of virtual memory, boot can take a very, very long time.
random past posts mention cp67l, cp67h, and cp67i work:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/93.html#23 MTS & LLMPS?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/93.html#26 MTS & LLMPS?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/94.html#18 CP/67 & OS MFT14
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/97.html#22 Pre S/360 IBM Operating Systems?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/97.html#26 IA64 Self Virtualizable?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/97.html#28 IA64 Self Virtualizable?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#21 Reviving the OS/360 thread (Questions about OS/360)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#93 MVS vs HASP vs JES (was 2821)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#81 Ux's good points.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#60 360 Architecture, Multics, ... was (Re: X86 ultimate CISC? No.)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#63 TSS ancient history, was X86 ultimate CISC? designs)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000g.html#16 360/370 instruction cycle time
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001b.html#23 Linux IA-64 interrupts [was Re: Itanium benchmarks ...]
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#7 Blame it all on Microsoft
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#53 Pre ARPAnet email?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#12 checking some myths.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#38 Playing Cards was Re: looking for information on the IBM
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#39 Playing Cards was Re: looking for information on the IBM
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#2 Computers in Science Fiction
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#50 crossreferenced program code listings
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#55 wrt code first, document later
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#70 hone acronym (cross post)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#56 10 choices that were critical to the Net's success
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#62 Itanium2 performance data from SGI
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#17 vax6k.openecs.org rebirth
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#72 cp/67 35th anniversary
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#29 Lisp Machines
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#51 vnet 1000th node anniversary 6/10
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#14 instant messaging
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003k.html#27 Microkernels are not "all or nothing". Re: Multics Concepts For
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003l.html#30 Secure OS Thoughts
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003m.html#31 SR 15,15 was: IEFBR14 Problems
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004.html#35 40th anniversary of IBM System/360 on 7 Apr 2004
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:15:49 GMTcstacy@news.dtpq.com (Christopher C. Stacy) writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A POX on you, Dennis Ritchie!!! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 00:19:49 GMTPeter Flass writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Next generation processor architecture? Newsgroups: comp.arch Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:50:11 GMT"Andy Glew" <glew2public-news@sbcglobal.net> writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A POX on you, Dennis Ritchie!!! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:42:18 GMTAlexandre Peshansky <alex*@*mail.rockefeller.edu> writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: CHECKSUM CHALLENGE - (US$ 100) Newsgroups: comp.misc,comp.programming,comp.dcom.modems,sci.crypt,comp.arch.embedded Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:16:11 GMT"Max Firmware" writes:
there is the ancient (in)famous case at cornell university that tried out new (RF_ wireless technology for campus communication between various mainframe operations. the mainframe communication controller used standard crc for detecting transmission errors. however, the wireless modem used similar polynomial for permuting transmission bits (maintain one-bits transmission density?). the result was that transmission errors tended to be permuted in such a way that they weren't caught by the CRC.
ancient ref (nearly 20 years old)
detail
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/read.cgi?fn=CRC-FAIL&ft=PROB&line=1
description
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/read.cgi?fn=CRC-FAIL&ft=PROB&line=474
discussion of crc polynomial issues:
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/read.cgi?fn=CRC-FAIL&ft=PROB&line=660
from a co-worker (at the time) ... purely random coincidence but he
happen to send me some email a couple weeks ago (after over ten years
lapse). in any case, in the above, he references an article on the
subject he worte for april 1985 PC tech journal titled "high
performance crc generation".
above fragments as single article:
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=CRC-FAIL&ft=PROB#660
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:32:30 GMTearlier post:
greenspan's testimony (live, in real time) is highlighting US education ssytem; at up to about 4th grade it is about average but by 12th grade it isn't competitive at all; many of the people that should be going thru grad. school aren't even making it thru highschool; in the future, all the high paying jobs will be conceptual based; the community college system is doing about the best job of retraining current workers for the new necessary skills.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:52:00 GMToh yes, slightly convoluted thread .. in:
there was reference to:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#45
which in turn referenced ... "scope of the literacy need" which had
some 1992 stats (general literacy, not technical):
https://web.archive.org/web/20100413134230/http://www.nifl.gov/nifl/facts/facts_overview.html
also from above ... 94-98 international literacy survey:
• The average composite literacy score of native-born adults in
the U.S. was 284 (Level 3); the U.S. ranked 10th out of 17
high-income countries;
• The mean prose literacy scores of U.S. adults with primary or no
education, ranked 14th out of 18 high-income countries;
• The mean prose literacy scores of U.S. adults with some high
school, but no diploma or GED, ranked 19th out of 19 high-income
countries;
• The mean prose literacy scores of U.S. adults with a high school
diploma or GED (but no college), ranked 18th (tie) out of 19
countries;
• The mean prose literacy scores of U.S. adults with 1-3 years of
college, ranked 15th out of 19 countries;
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: SSL certificates Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,sci.crypt,microsoft.public.windowsnt.protocol.tcpip,comp.protocols.tcp-ip Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:13:42 GMTMailman writes:
lots of past comments about SSL merchant server "comfort" certificates:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subpubkey.html#sslcert
ssl was to address perceived weakness involving perceived domain name hijacking weaknesses in the domain name infrastructure; merchants would get a ssl server certificate from a TTP (trusted third party) certification authority with their domain name, client browsers would compare the domain name in the certificate with the URL they typed ... and have some comfort that the server they were talking to was the one they expected to talk to from the URL. there was also the issue that it supported an encrypted session, hiding the credit card number while in transit.
a couple issues:
1) The TTP-CAs aren't the authoritative agency as to who owns the domain name ... the domain name infrastructure is the authoritative agency as to who owns the domain name. As part of the TTP-CA issuing the ceritifcate to the merchant ... they had to contact the domain name infrastructure to see if the entity requesting the certificate is the same entity that owns the domain name ... however this is the domain name infrastructure that has the integrity issues that gave rise to desire for needing certificates. So somewhat from the TTP-CA industry there has been some proposals to improve the integrity of the domain name infrastructure ... so that the TTP-CA industry can trust them as part of issuing certificates. However, the net is that various of the proposals to improve the integrity of the domain name infrastructure (so that it can be trusted by the TTP-CA industry as part of issuing certificates) also improves the domain name infrastructure integrity so it can be trusted by everybody ... going a long ways to eliminating the original requirement for needing the merchant comfort certificates in the first place.
2) the major vulnerability to credit card numbers have been havesting
of the transaction files from the merchant location. this is what
shows up in all the press ... various references:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subintegrity.html#fraud
where the crook gets a hundred thousand numbers in one operation ...
as compared to the theoritical evesdropping attack trying to catch a
credit card number in flight ... a vulnerability for which
there have been no known published actually occurances (as far as i
know) ... the ROI fraud is so much higher harvesting the transaction
file compared to try and get something out of evesdropping. a
discussion of security proportional to risk/fraud ... and the threat
model associated with the merchant transaction file:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#61
so the two threat models address by SSL merchant server certificates:
a) vulnerability in domain name infrastructure with domain name hijacking .... except to some degree certificates are cosmetic coating since the vulnerabilities are still there and somebody just hijacks the domain name and then applies for the certificate (and in fact the CA industry has motivated solutions to the domain name infrastructure vulnerabilities but the solutions would also eliminate justification for needing certificates).
b) vulnerability in credit card number transmission ... for which there have been no published exploits ... since it is so much more productive to harvest the merchant transaction file.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: SSL certificates Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,sci.crypt,microsoft.public.windowsnt.protocol.tcpip,comp.protocols.tcp-ip Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:48:14 GMT"Pete Davis" writes:
slightly related ... previous post regarding key sizes and
attack resistance:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004b.html#11 Is 3DES more secure than 384 bit RSA?
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: SSL certificates Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,sci.crypt,microsoft.public.windowsnt.protocol.tcpip,comp.protocols.tcp-ip Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:57:58 GMTPaul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> writes:
note however there is supposedly a "chain of trust" ... however the chain of trust goes all the way back to the authoritative agency that the CA checks with for validating the information that goes into their signed certificate. In the case of SSL domain name certificates, the authoritative agency for who owns a domain name is the domain name infrastructure; so the trust root ... isn't with the CA ... but is with the authoritative agency that the CA uses for validating the information as part of the certification. Trust propagation goes from the domain name infrastructure to the CA to the client (i.e. the CA is the trust root for the certificate ... but not for the actual validatity of the information being certified contained in the certificate).
However, the catch-22 is that the original justification for these certificates were trust and integrity issues with the domain name infrastructure .... which continues to be the trust root .... even with SSL domain name server certificates. So there are some proposals to improve the integrity of the domain name infrastructure ... somewhat prompted by the CA industry. However, many of the integrity improvements for the domain name infrastructure also go a long way to eliminating the original justifications for the certificates.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:22:09 GMTAnne & Lynn Wheeler writes:
a related thread ran recently in comp.arch regarding social security
beneifts not being fully funded (and future generations will have to
make up the difference):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004b.html#9 A hundred subjects: 64-bit OS2/eCs, Innoteck Products
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004b.html#21 A hundred subjects: 64-bit OS2/eCs, Innoteck Products
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:20:35 GMTBrian Inglis writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Foiling Replay Attacks Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:10:58 GMTMark Shelor writes:
payment system uses a log and looks for duplicate transactions (which include the full details of the transaction) ... but it is a atomic operation with single round-trip scenario w/o protocol chatter. because of infrastructure issues the times are a little fuzzy. there have been instances where a person used credit card to make to succesive identical purchases at a merchant and have the 2nd one rejected as duplicate.
the depth of the log can be abbreviated based on how synchronized the clocks are (and therefor the timestamps) ... or just recording the previously sequentially used number.
for non-single round trip allowing protocol chatter ... there are instances like RADIUS login scenario where the client contacts the server, the server responds with a random number/challenge, the client combines the server random number/challenge with client random number ... digitally signs the combined value and returns the message and digital signature.
the real-time protocol chatter, in effect, substitutes for having a log of (one or more) previous interactions. w/o the real-time protocol chatter, some sort of log is used. the depth of the log may be one deep if the environment is sufficiently controlled. In a less controlled environment, the log may have to consist of interactions spanning hours or even days.
random previous replay attack threads:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#20 What is PKI?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm12.htm#6 NEWS: 3D-Secure and Passport
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm13.htm#27 How effective is open source crypto?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm13.htm#28 How effective is open source crypto? (addenda)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm13.htm#29 How effective is open source crypto? (bad form)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm13.htm#31 How effective is open source crypto? (bad form)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm14.htm#30 Maybe It's Snake Oil All the Way Down
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm16.htm#13 The PAIN mnemonic
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm16.htm#22 Ousourced Trust (was Re: Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card and something else before
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm17.htm#2 Difference between TCPA-Hardware and a smart card (was: example: secure computing kernel needed)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002m.html#14 fingerprint authentication
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#70 Simple resource protection with public keys
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#25 Idea for secure login
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003m.html#50 public key vs passwd authentication?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003p.html#6 Does OTP need authentication?
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Foiling Replay Attacks Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:33:23 GMT"Tom St Denis" writes:
When the client goes to login, the server presents N-1 and the server-specific value. The client then repeats the original operation but only performs the hash N-1 times ... and returns the value. The server then performs the hash one additional time and checks it with the recorded value for N-times. If they match, the session is successful and the server updates the iteration value to N-1 and the recently presented hash value.
The stated purpose is that 1) this foils evesdropping attacks listening to cleartext password transmission, 2) client only has to remember the password/passphrase (everything else is remembered by the server) and 3) the same password can be used with a large number of different servers (addressing the huge human factors problem with having to deal with scores of unique passwords).
The MITM attack is that the attacker evesdrops on the communication (as assumed under the basic justification for the whole design) and and substitutes a count of "1" in the transmission to the client (in place of N-1). The attacker now has the first hash ... and can repeat the rest of the hashes and transmit to the server (and then gets out of the way of the rest of the session). Later the attacker can impersonate the client for any hash value larger than one (w/o knowing the actual password).
minor past ref:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003m.html#50 public key vs passwd authentication
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: ARPAnet guest accounts, and longtime email addresses Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,alt.folklore.computers Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:14:28 GMT... from long ago and far away ...
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 91 12:24:28 IST From: Hank Nussbacher <HANK%VM.BIU.AC.IL@TAUNIVM.TAU.AC.IL> Subject: Network maps v2 To: tcp-ip@nic.ddn.mil This document is meant to catalog all known network maps in postscript format that are available via the Internet. One purpose is so that people can review other network maps for ideas and formats. The main purpose is for the newly forming RIPE mapping WG to determine what icons people use in their network maps and to create an RFC that standardizes the icons as well as the format that people will create for their network maps. Please send all corrections and additions to this list to: hank@vm.tau.ac.il CAVAET: Some Postscript maps won't print correctly on many laser printers. This is due to the files being in Apple Postscript rather than in standard postscript. Most maps reported here will print properly. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number aarnet.edu.au 139.130.204.4 2) cd __________ pub/maps 3) get ___________.ps aarn-backbone.ps 4) What is included in your map? Backbone of AARNet network, link speeds, comment on topology 5) How often is it updated? Whenever something significant changes! Say, every three months, 6) Contact? P.Elford@aarnet.edu.au ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number ftp.cc.berkeley.edu 128.32.136.9 2) cd __________ pub 3) get ___________.ps ucb.map.ps 4) What is included in your map? The UCB IP routers 5) How often is it updated? Whenever I feel like it (actually I just created it recently). 6) Contact? cliff@garnet.berkeley.edu ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number Arizona.EDU 128.196.128.233 2) cd __________ networks.maps 3) get ___________.ps uanet-prepped.ps 4) What is included in your map? Subnets of the University of Arizona's network (128.196.0.0). 5) How often is it updated? Once every couple of months or so. 6) Contact? Leonard@Arizona.EDU ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number NIS.NSF.NET 35.1.1.48 2) cd __________ maps 3) get ___________.ps ASIANET PS V 128 276 8 1/17/89 1:30:13 BACKBONE NEW-PS V 117 6765 50 10/01/90 14:41:43 BACKBONE OLD-PS V 94 2437 25 2/24/89 15:40:22 BACKBONE OLD2-PS V 94 2445 25 2/24/89 15:39:57 BACKBONE T1-PS V 106 6375 46 4/18/91 12:36:39 BACKBONE T1T3-PS V 108 7088 51 4/23/91 9:39:58 BACKBONE T3-PS V 117 6515 46 4/18/91 15:05:57 BARRNET PS V 124 1222 10 5/30/90 11:39:03 BITNET PS V 130 2870 85 1/17/89 1:30:20 BITNET4 PS V 130 3389 101 1/17/89 1:30:28 CERFNET PS V 876 3594 24 11/30/90 11:03:39 CICNET PS V 28 23597 68 2/11/91 18:16:12 CORNELL PS V 112 110 2 2/17/89 1:53:49 DC PS V 99 421 5 3/23/89 11:01:45 EARNET PS V 129 1447 43 1/17/89 1:30:33 ESNET PS V 94 2462 25 5/05/89 14:10:25 HARVARD MAP V 78 59 1 2/17/89 1:57:53 LOSNETTO PS V 106 1309 9 11/27/90 17:26:12 MERIT-MI PS V 88 6449 19 6/01/90 11:50:09 MIDNET PS V 132 730 6 2/17/89 1:52:58 NA_NETS PS V 94 2802 26 5/17/89 9:56:55 NCAR PS V 255 1602 11 2/17/89 1:52:46 NETMAP DOC V 78 1140 13 2/24/89 16:05:27 NETNORTH PS V 129 511 16 1/17/89 1:30:36 NYSERNET PS V 53 2475 9 2/17/89 1:56:40 PREPNET PS V 80 1856 9 2/22/89 9:59:39 PSC_IP PS V 80 3479 18 2/22/89 9:59:48 RICENET PS-LW V 57 2079 8 3/07/89 16:31:24 SCINET PS V 94 2536 26 4/28/89 14:23:35 SCINETDC PS V 100 280 3 4/28/89 16:40:31 SESQUINE PS-LW V 53 610 3 3/07/89 16:31:11 SURANET PS V 87 1158 13 3/23/89 11:01:40 SURAN289 PS V 96 468 4 3/07/89 16:29:10 TEXASIP PS V 96 405 4 3/07/89 16:28:32 UIUC PS V 93 904 5 12/28/88 14:10:34 UIUC-MAP PS V 72 3892 14 12/28/88 14:10:45 UMNET PS V 124 1343 9 5/30/90 10:14:22 UNETS-A PS V 94 3824 29 5/14/90 14:29:51 USENIX PS V 79 4916 17 2/10/89 9:29:59 USNETS PS V 94 3824 29 5/14/90 14:26:37 4) What is included in your map? 5) How often is it updated? 6) Contact? userhelp@nis.nsf.net ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number mcsun.eu.net 192.16.202.1 2) cd __________ ripe/maps 3) get ___________.ps Jun 4 10:25 europe.ps Feb 2 1990 map01-netnums.ps.Z Feb 2 1990 map01-speeds.ps.Z Jun 15 1990 map02-netnums.ps.Z Jun 20 1990 map02-speeds.ps.Z Jul 9 1990 map03-legend.ps.Z Jul 9 1990 map03-netnums.ps.Z Jul 9 1990 map03-speeds.ps.Z Aug 28 1990 map04-legend.ps.Z Aug 28 1990 map04-netnums-1p.ps.Z Aug 28 1990 map04-netnums-2p.ps.Z Aug 28 1990 map04-speeds-1p.ps.Z Aug 28 1990 map04-speeds-2p.ps.Z Nov 9 1990 map05-legend.ps.Z Nov 9 1990 map05-netnums-1p.ps.Z Nov 9 1990 map05-netnums-2p.ps.Z Nov 9 1990 map05-speeds-1p.ps.Z Nov 9 1990 map05-speeds-2p.ps.Z Feb 27 14:16 map06-legend.ps.Z Feb 27 13:55 map06-netnums.ps.Z Feb 27 13:54 map06-speeds.ps.Z Jun 4 10:25 us-europe.ps 4) What is included in your map? 5) How often is it updated? 6) Contact? ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number nic.nordu.net 192.36.148.17 2) cd __________ maps 3) get ___________.ps Nov 9 1990 ch-map-netnums.ps Nov 9 1990 ch-map-speeds.ps May 26 20:35 europe.ps Mar 2 1990 fi-map.ps Mar 2 1990 fr-map.ps Nov 9 1990 map05-legend.ps Nov 9 1990 map05-netnums-1p.ps Nov 9 1990 map05-netnums-2p.ps Nov 9 1990 map05-speeds-1p.ps Nov 9 1990 map05-speeds-2p.ps Mar 14 1990 nl-map.ps Mar 2 1990 no-map.ps Nov 9 1990 nordunet.ps May 26 20:36 us-europe.ps 4) What is included in your map? 5) How often is it updated? 6) Contact? ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number ftp.pitt.edu 130.49.253.1 2) cd __________ /prepnet/maps 3) get ___________.ps member_map_mmddyy.ps connectivity_map_mmddyy.ps 4) What is included in your map? member map is the geographical locations of our members and shows the backbone circuits; connectivity map shows how the routers are connected and the speed of the connections 5) How often is it updated? member map is updated each time we have a new member; connectivity map is updated each time a member is connected or a member changes some configuration 6) Contact? kf1b+@andrew.cmu.edu ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number spot.colorado.edu 128.138.129.2 2) cd __________ westnet 3) get ___________.ps map.ps 4) What is included in your map? A logical map of Westnet, the Rocky Mountain states Internet regional network.--
5) How often is it updated? 6) Contact? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number nisc.sesqui.net 128.241.0.84 2) cd __________ pub 3) get ___________.ps texas.ps 4) what is included in your map? The combined IP topology of Sesquinet and THEnet implemented as a single autonomous system of Cisco routers. No detail at the campus level is included. 5) how often is it updated? Whenever this topology changes. 6) Contact? ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number vm.tau.ac.il 132.66.32.4 2) cd __________ hank.400 3) get ___________.ps ilanmap.ps 4) what is included in your map? The cisco router backbone in Israel, line speeds, router interfaces and subnet addresses. Certain headers and legends are in Hebrew. 5) how often is it updated? Whenever this topology changes. 6) Contact? ccyilan@technion.technion.ac.il ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number ftp.lcs.mit.edu 18.26.0.36 2) cd __________ nets 3) get ___________.ps get {LCS,AI,MIT,NEAR}.PS 4) what is included in your map? LCS: The lab where I work AI: Another lab closely connected in the same building MIT: MIT overall (slightly out-of-date, does not have new FDDI yet) NEAR: NEARnet, the New England Academic and Research network (an NSFnet regional) 5) how often is it updated? 6) Contact? map@lcs.mit.edu ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number cs.ucl.ac.uk 128.16.5.31 2) cd __________ bbn 3) get ___________.ps icb_twb_map.ps 4) what is included in your map? A topology map of the Terrestrial Wideband Net (twbnet) and the International Cooperation Board Net (icbnet). 5) how often is it updated? 6) Contact? J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number nic.near.net 192.52.71.4 2) cd __________ maps 3) get ___________.ps nearnet-topology.PS 4) what is included in your map? 5) how often is it updated? Weekly 6) Contact? jcurran@nic.near.net ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number nisc.jvnc.net 128.121.50.7 2) cd __________ nicol/MAPS 3) get ___________.ps JvNCnet.PS 4) What is included in your map? Sites connected, backbone topologies, and speed of links. 5) How often is it updated? Monthly, at least. 6) Contact? nisc@jvnc.net ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number ns.nic.yorku.ca 130.63.7.3 2) cd __________ pub/york/maps 3) get ___________.ps ip-backbone-v3.2.ps 4) what is included in your map? 5) how often is it updated? 6) Contact? ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number noc.sura.net 192.80.214.100 2) cd __________ maps 3) get ___________.ps noc.map.ps directions.map.ps geo.map.ps sites.map.ps 4) what is included in your map? 5) how often is it updated? 6) Contact? ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number ftphost.nwnet.net 128.95.112.1 2) cd __________ local/nwnet 3) get ___________.ps nwnet-map.ps 4) what is included in your map? 5) how often is it updated? 6) Contact? ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number nic.es.net 128.55.32.3 2) cd __________ maps 3) get ___________.ps ESNET-BACKBONE-MAP.PS 4) what is included in your map? 5) how often is it updated? 6) Contact? ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1) anonymous ftp name and number nic.barrnet.net 36.56.0.151 2) cd __________ barrnet 3) get ___________.ps barrnet.geog.ps barrnet.ps 4) what is included in your map? 5) how often is it updated? 6) Contact?
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: new to mainframe asm Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:50:09 GMTpeterh5322@aol.comminch (Peter H.) writes:
besides the pathlength stuff mentioned in the above ... one of the
changes was the genesis of fair share scheduling .... which was
shipped in standard cp/67 release, dropped in the initial conversion
to vm/370 and then re-introduced with the resource manager:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#fairshare
another undergraduate activity was the original global/clock
replacement algorithm. at the time, the working set paper had just
been published in ACM ... but this work differed significantly
... including the use of global replacement instead of local
replacement.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#wsclock
over ten years later when somebody had done their phd thesis work at stanford on clock ... there was big issue made about whether global replacement was better than local replacement (and whether or not the person should even get their phd). part of the resolution was early '70s comparison on same hardware & software base of both local and global replacement implementations (with global replacement having upwards of 300 percent better thruput compared to local replacement).
various postings about getting blamed for helping create ibm PCM
controller market ... when I was undergraduate, I added tty/ascii
support to the cp/67 kernel and was trying to play games with 2702 to
do automatic terminal type recognition. it turns out while you could
change the line-scanner with the SAD commands, they had took shortcut
in 2702 and hardwired the oscillator ... so in testing, I sort of got
TTYs to work on "2741" baud line. as a result, a project was started
at the university that reverse engineered the ibm channel interface
and built a channel board for an Interdata3 minicomputer. the
interdata3 was then programmed to simulate 2702 functions ... but line
baud rate was software programmable (instead of hardwired oscillator).
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#360pcm
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Automating secure transactions Newsgroups: comp.security.misc Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:46:44 GMTkj writes:
here is recent ref might find interesting: Passwords to guard entry
aren't enough to protect complex data:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-02/su-ptg021304.php
run w/o human supervision ... is frequently along the lines of various kinds of service deliverables ... where as much as possible is automated ... since people make mistakes ... including but not limited to security mistakes. I've contended that effort to take a straight line application and turn it into a service application (human free) can take ten times the (original) effort and may typically need 4-10 times as much code.
for the most part ... for a security application to understand highly sensitive information ... the information needs security labels ... and then prescribed rules relating to the various security levles ... so try search engine with things like "security label", "mandatory access control", "mandatory security policy", etc.
another source is some of NIST documents:
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/drafts.html
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/index.htm
http://csrc.nist.gov/rbac/
minor discussion of security proportional to risk:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#61
also of possibly some interest:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#42 thirty years later, lessons from the multics security evaluation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#44 thirty years later, lessons from the multics security evaluation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#45 thirty years later, lessons from the multics security evaluation
misc. refs to predominate use of SSL in the world today:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subpubkey.html#sslcert
security also mean things like availability in addition to
confidentiality ... as well as assurance; misc. random postings on
assurance
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subintegrity.html#assurance
highly dependable computing ... security, assurance, integrity, etc
taken as a whole, not just intrusions or leakage of confidential
information:
http://www.hdcc.cs.cmu.edu/index.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20011004023230/http://www.hdcc.cs.cmu.edu/may01/index.html
a couple notes specifically with respect to the original internet
payment gateway:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm5.htm#asrn2
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm5.htm#asrn3
random refs to service operation 4-10 times code, automated operator,
service operations, etc:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#35a Drive letters
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#37 What is MVS/ESA?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#40 Comparison Cluster vs SMP?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#71 High Availabilty on S/390
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#77 Are mainframes relevant ??
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#92 MVS vs HASP vs JES (was 2821)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#107 Computer History
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#128 Examples of non-relational databases
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#136a checks (was S/390 on PowerPC?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#13 Computer of the century
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#22 Computer of the century
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#45 Does the word "mainframe" still have a meaning?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#47 Does the word "mainframe" still have a meaning?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#12 Amdahl Exits Mainframe Market
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#30 OT?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#54 360 Architecture, Multics, ... was (Re: X86 ultimate CISC? No.)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001.html#43 Life as a programmer--1960, 1965?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001c.html#13 LINUS for S/390
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001c.html#69 Wheeler and Wheeler
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#70 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#71 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#44 Where are IBM z390 SPECint2000 results?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#47 Where are IBM z390 SPECint2000 results?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#75 Test and Set (TS) vs Compare and Swap (CS)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#44 The Alpha/IA64 Hybrid
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#8 VM: checking some myths.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#23 OT - Internet Explorer V6.0
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#13 HP-UX will not be ported to Alpha (no surprise)exit
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#14 HP-UX will not be ported to Alpha (no surprise)exit
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#18 HP-UX will not be ported to Alpha (no surprise)exit
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#47 five-nines
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#3 News IBM loses supercomputer crown
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#47 Sysplex Info
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#85 The demise of compaq
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#91 Buffer overflow
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#93 Buffer overflow
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#24 Buffer overflow
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#68 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#73 Where did text file line ending characters begin?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#45 M$ SMP and old time IBM's LCMP
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#62 Itanium2 performance data from SGI
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#11 Wanted: the SOUNDS of classic computing
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#27 why does wait state exist?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#14 Home mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#68 META: Newsgroup cliques?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002p.html#54 Newbie: Two quesions about mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#37 Calculating expected reliability for designed system
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#3 Disk capacity and backup solutions
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#62 IBM says AMD dead in 5yrs ... -- Microsoft Monopoly vs. IBM
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#56 The figures of merit that make mainframes worth the price
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#60 The figures of merit that make mainframes worth the price
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#27 instant messaging
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#15 A Dark Day
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003l.html#11 how long does (or did) it take to boot a timesharing system?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003n.html#22 foundations of relational theory? - some references for the
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003n.html#29 Architect Mainframe system - books/guidenance
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003n.html#45 hung/zombie users ... long boring, wandering story
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003p.html#37 The BASIC Variations
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004.html#40 AMD/Linux vs Intel/Microsoft
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: new to mainframe asm Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 04:08:00 GMTpeterh5322@aol.comminch (Peter H.) writes:
PCM stuff as one of the motivating factors behind FS in the early '70s
(FS project was possibly also one reason Amdahl may have left and
formed Amdahl); random FS threads:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#futuresys
a little more overview:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#16 FS - IBM Future System
later in the '80s periodically got into difficulties with raleigh
because of various HSDT activities ... random refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#hsdt
and possibly a later generation 37xx replacement .. part of a
presentation that I gave at an SNA ARB (architecture review board)
meeting in raleigh in the 80s:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#67 System/1 ?
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:31:48 GMTrogblake10@iname10.com (Roger Blake) writes:
part of the lumping into identity theft hasn't been so much because the kinds of misuse are similar ... but because the harvesting of information is similar ... and there are efforts underway to increase the difficulty of being able to harvest such information ... generally associated with various privacy initiatives.
there are also some numbers that the non-account-fraud types of identity theft have much greater personal financial impact than does straight account fraud.
some more specific references:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aepay12.htm#24 More on the ID theft saga
some information related to privacy initiatives ... see the notes
on privacy glossary in the section:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/index.html#glosnote
more general fraud and vulnerability references:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subintegrity.html#fraud
a little topic drift regarding account information havesting and fraud
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#61 security proportional to risk
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Using Old OS for Security Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.networking,comp.security.firewalls,comp.security.misc Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:48:55 GMTdoes this qualify:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: The SOB that helped IT jobs move to India is dead! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:36:32 GMTjsavard@ecn.aSBLOKb.caNADA.invalid (John Savard) writes:
The issue was work by itself, wouldn't eliminate poverty ... because there were jobs where the value of work performed was less than what was necessary to live above the poverty line. If everybody was performing such jobs ... then it would be impossible to have anybody living above the proverty line (there wouldn't be anybody performing the higher value jobs that could be taxed in order to subsidize the lower value jobs). For those performing the lower value jobs, there needs to be sufficient people performing the higher value jobs and generate enuf taxes such that the low value work can be subsidized to raise those people above the proverty line.
The issue in the boston globe article (30 years ago now) was that the US government wasn't doing explicit economic planning and setting national objectives ... like long term planning to relocate/retrain workers from lower-value jobs into higher-value jobs and for long term economic health it would be better to spend any available funds on retraining rather than trying to maintain existing status quo .. aka tariffs were delaying the industries going out of business ... but the funds from the tariffs weren't being applied to retraining the workers for new jobs.
Possibly 7-8 years later there was a somewhat complimentary article in the washington post about the japanese auto import quotas ... which called for an 100% unearned profit tax on the us automobile industry. Supposedly the import quotas removed price pressure on US autos and provided for a large increase in US automaker profitability. Supposedly that huge increase in profitability was supposed to be plowed back into totally revamping the US auto industry. The claim was instead that the profits went into salary increases and dividends (and since the industry wasn't using the unearned profits for the desired purpose, the gov. should go ahead and collect them).
In the mean time, the japanese auto industry supposedly looked at the quotas and figured out at that limit ... they could sell all high-priced cars ... rather than the low-priced cars they had been selling. This motivated them to totally revamp their industry ... and among other things cut the elapsed time to produce a new model from 7yrs to 3yrs. The japanese moving into the high priced market niche ... initially also futher reduced any downward price pressure on US cars (combination of quota and the japanese move from the low-end market to the high-end market). In some sense this was the inverse of the original purpose of the quotas ... instead of motivating a complete revamp of the US industry to make it more competitive ... it allowed them to maintain status quo and prompted foreign competition to do a complete revamp making them even more competitive.
In the abstract ... it is obvious that some job is better than no job aka the amount of subsidy needed to make up the difference between a low value jobs and the proverty line would be less than subsidy needed to bring somebody with no job to the proverty line. However, a policy of only/just having indefinite subsidies for low/no-value jobs could eventually run out of sources of funds for providing those subsidies.
As an aside, one of the japanese auto makers recently took over no. two
position from Ford. part of past thread:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#43 Reason Japanese cars are assembled in the US (was Re: American bigotry)
part of a more recent thread on foreign competition:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#28 Offshore IT
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: origin of the UNIX dd command Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:43:35 GMTAndrew McLaren <amclar@optusnet.n0$pam.com.au> writes:
The "problem" was that standard unit record (card reader/printer) input/ouput to/from the job scheduler was spending all its time (synchronously) waiting for the unit record I/O. Pre-360s, with 709x/etc, a 1401 was used to perform unit record to/from tape and the tapes were moved back and forth between the 1401 and the 709x for actual execution. The university I was at ... with IBSYS monitor on 709 (all tubes) running student fortran jobs tape to tape ... could do student jobs on the order of second. Moving to early OS/360 on 360/65 ... it was taking on the order of 100 times longer for each student fortran job.
Installation of HASP cut that to on the order of 30 seconds (hasp handling the unit record i/o asynchronously to dasd/disk ... and the job scheduler doing its input/output to/from disk rather than unit record directly).
The following describes simple student fortran job stream ... with
approximately 90 percent of the processing in the job scheduler ...
and only minor time spent actually doing fortran compile and
execution (i.e. 11.7 seconds out of 12.9 seconds total per job):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/94.html#18 CP/67 and OS MFT14
Standard OS/360 system build resulted in elapsed time of approximately 30seconds per job. By extremely careful build of the system so that data on dasd/disk was very carefully ordered for optimal dasd/disk arm seek, i got the elasped time per job down from a little over 30 seconds to 12.9 seconds (over 200 percent improvement). However, this was still about 12-15 times slower than 709.
It wasn't until the university started using WATFOR monitor for student fortran jobs that elapsed time per job got to the point where it faster than what it had been on the 709. WATFOR basically was a subtasking monitor, fortran compile and execution environment. It would be started (using standard JCL and the job scheduler) and then typically be feed a whole card tray of student jobs, typically 30-100, in a single batch run. The WATFOR monitor would handle the transition between different student jobs w/o having to resort to the job scheduler, jcl processing, etc.
The reference:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/94.html#18 CP/67 and OS MFT14
was from a presentation that I made at the fall '68, Atlantic City share meeting while an undergraduate. While it mentions the work I had done for extremely controlled OS/360 system builds for optimal placement of data on dasd/disk ... the primary focus of the presentation was on some early work I had done rewriting major portions of the CP/67 kernel to get a 80 percent cpu pathlength reduction. I had earlier done other presentations at share and guide about the "in-queue" and "careful re-ordering" os/360 sysgen builds.
In the 370 time-frame ... some number of the Houston HASP people were moved to gaithesburg to form the JES2 development group. HASP was renamed to JES2 ... but to this day there are still HASP tagged messages. The other spooling system from that time frame was ASP ... with two independent processors sharing some of the same DASD/disk. One of the processors would somewhat be dedicated to unit record I/O ... somewhat akin to the 709x/1401 condigurations but using shared dasd/disks instead of tape ... while the other processor ... typically a much faster 360 model ... would actually be performing job execution. Responsibility for ASP was eventually also transferred to the g'burg group and renamed JES3. At the time, my wife was one of the "catchers" for ASP in the g'burg group with responsibility for helping turn ASP into JES3 (this was before they con'ed her into going to POK with responsibility for loosely-coupled architecture).
lots of past asp, hasp, jes2, & jes3 posts
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/93.html#2 360/67, was Re: IBM's Project F/S ?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/93.html#15 unit record & other controllers
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/94.html#2 Schedulers
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/94.html#18 CP/67 & OS MFT14
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/95.html#7 Who built the Internet? (was: Linux/AXP.. Reliable?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#9 cics
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#12 IBM song
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/97.html#22 Pre S/360 IBM Operating Systems?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/97.html#25 Early RJE Terminals (was Re: First Network?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/97.html#28 IA64 Self Virtualizable?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#21 Reviving the OS/360 thread (Questions about OS/360)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#29 Drive letters
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#33 why is there an "@" key?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#58 When did IBM go object only
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#76 Mainframes at Universities
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#77 Are mainframes relevant ??
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#92 MVS vs HASP vs JES (was 2821)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#93 MVS vs HASP vs JES (was 2821)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#94 MVS vs HASP vs JES (was 2821)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#109 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#110 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#113 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#117 OS390 bundling and version numbers -Reply
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#209 Core (word usage) was anti-equipment etc
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#212 GEOPLEX
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#13 Computer of the century
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#55 OS/360 JCL: The DD statement and DCBs
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#76 Mainframe operating systems
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#77 Mainframe operating systems
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#78 Mainframe operating systems
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#88 ASP (was: mainframe operating systems)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#10 IBM 1460
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#18 IBM 1460
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#20 IBM 1460
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#29 The first "internet" companies?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#36 Assembly language formatting on IBM systems
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#44 Charging for time-share CPU time
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#45 Charging for time-share CPU time
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000e.html#14 internet preceeds Gore in office.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000e.html#15 internet preceeds Gore in office.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#30 OT?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#37 OT?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#58 360 Architecture, Multics, ... was (Re: X86 ultimate CISC? No.)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#68 TSS ancient history, was X86 ultimate CISC? designs)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#71 HASP vs. "Straight OS," not vs. ASP
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001b.html#73 7090 vs. 7094 etc.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001c.html#69 Wheeler and Wheeler
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#6 Blame it all on Microsoft
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#7 Blame it all on Microsoft
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#12 Blame it all on Microsoft
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#69 line length (was Re: Babble from "JD" <dyson@jdyson.com>)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#71 line length (was Re: Babble from "JD" <dyson@jdyson.com>)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#2 Mysterious Prefixes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#26 Price of core memory
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#22 Golden Era of Compilers
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#44 The Alpha/IA64 Hybrid
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#46 The Alpha/IA64 Hybrid
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#48 The Alpha/IA64 Hybrid
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#12 checking some myths.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#60 Whom Do Programmers Admire Now???
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#7 YKYGOW...
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#30 IBM OS Timeline?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#33 Waterloo Interpreters (was Re: RAX (was RE: IBM OS Timeline?))
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#45 OT - Internet Explorer V6.0
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#37 Is anybody out there still writting BAL 370.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#11 OCO
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#12 Author seeks help - net in 1981
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#37 Hercules etc. IBM not just missing a great opportunity...
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#60 CMS FILEDEF DISK and CONCAT
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#31 index searching
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#53 Computer Naming Conventions
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#56 Computer Naming Conventions
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#57 Computer Naming Conventions
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#59 Computer Naming Conventions
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002c.html#4 Did Intel Bite Off More Than It Can Chew?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002c.html#50 Swapper was Re: History of Login Names
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#25 Crazy idea: has it been done?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#37 Playing Cards was Re: looking for information on the IBM 7090
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#38 Playing Cards was Re: looking for information on the IBM
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#53 WATFOR's Silver Anniversary
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#61 GE 625/635 Reference + Smart Hardware
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#2 DISK PL/I Program
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#14 Why did OSI fail compared with TCP-IP?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#22 Why did OSI fail compared with TCP-IP?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#64 vm marketing (cross post)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#75 30th b'day
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#20 Vnet : Unbelievable
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#23 Vnet : Unbelievable
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#34 30th b'day .... original vm/370 announcement letter (by popular demand)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#42 MVS 3.8J and NJE via CTC
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#48 MVS 3.8J and NJE via CTC
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002m.html#3 The problem with installable operating systems
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#53 SHARE MVT Project anniversary
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#54 SHARE MVT Project anniversary
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#58 IBM S/370-168, 195, and 3033
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#24 IBM Selectric as printer
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002p.html#16 myths about Multics
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#23 Free Desktop Cyber emulation on PC before Christmas
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#29 Collating on the S/360-2540 card reader?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#31 Collating on the S/360-2540 card reader?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#32 Collating on the S/360-2540 card reader?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#35 HASP:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#36 HASP:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#37 HASP:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#39 HASP:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#49 myths about Multics
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#68 3745 & NCP Withdrawl?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#51 HASP assembly: What the heck is an MVT ABEND 422?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#53 HASP assembly: What the heck is an MVT ABEND 422?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#55 HASP assembly: What the heck is an MVT ABEND 422?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#63 Re : OT: One for the historians - 360/91
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#59 unix
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#0 early vnet & exploit
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#13 Page Table - per OS/Process
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#64 UT200 (CDC RJE) Software for TOPS-10?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#12 Which monitor for Fujitsu Micro 16s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#19 tcp time out for idle sessions
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003m.html#53 model 91/CRJE and IKJLEW
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003m.html#57 wsmr-simtel20 shut down 10 years ago today
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: origin of the UNIX dd command Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:54:38 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
the eventual report was that I had actually understated the decline
in performance. they eventually turned the investigation into a report
on guidelines about optimizing disk allocation and usage. some
summary/extracts from the paper (delivered at share '84 meeting):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#46 MVS History (all parts)
other references:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#40 MVS History (all parts)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#18 AS/400 and MVS - clarification please
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#22 360/370 disk drives
note that the relative system performance of disk/dasd has continued to decline. basically
1) memory is being used to cache stuff to minimize disk accesses ... making careful layout of data with respect to disk geometry less of an issue.
2) accesses have had more relative performance decline than transfer rate so there is some movement to making larger and larger block tranfers (per access)
... note that larger block transfers also increases memory usage as compensating factor for declining relative system disk/dasd performance (basically expanded usage of various electronic memory for caching is being used increasingly as latency compensation technique at all levels of system design).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Oldest running code Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 03:23:32 GMTIBM-MAIN@ibm-main.isham-research.com (Phil Payne) writes:
does GML count as a programming language? ... possibly have some stuff from 71 or 72 ... but probably doesn't still run w/o doing some simple conversion to html
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Oldest running code Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 05:32:15 GMThere is (CP67) CMS program written in late 60s to wait for reader interrupt ... which (hopefully) should still run. basically could be called by EXEC to wait on something arriving in the reader.
&CONTROL OFF CP SP C CL Y -READ DISK LOAD &IF &RETCODE EQ 0 &SKIP 1 WAIT RDR1RDR1the above CMS exec was when i found out that with a little bit of slight of hand, you could invoke CMS system calls directly from exec w/o having to write assembler routine (substituting the direct wait system call where I previously invoked my own assembler routine ... aka CMS system calls were SVC202 with list of 8byte tokens, including the name of the kernel function being invoked, in fact command lookup formed consistent search order of exec files, command files, and then kernel call). misc. past refs:-DSKLOAD DISK LOAD CP SP C CL A
TITLE 'WAIT FOR RDR INTERUPT - CMS - ' SPACE 2 WAITRDR START SAVE (14,12),,* SPACE USING WAITRDR,R11 LR R11,R15 LOAD BASE LR R6,R1 PRESERVE POINTER TO P-LIST LA R6,8(R6) BUMP PAST MOD NAME ST R14,R14SAVE SAVE RETURN ADDRESS * HNDINT SET,(RDR1,RDRINT,00C,WAIT) * WAITD RDR1 HNDINT CLR,RDR1 ************************************ ** WERE DONE RETURN * ************************************ RETURN DS 0H LA R15,0 L R14,R14SAVE BR R14 RETURN ************************************ ** HANDLE READER INTERUPT * ************************************ USING *,R12 RDRINT DS 0H LA R15,0 SET RETURN CODE ( TELL CMS WE'RE DONE ) BR R14 RETURN EJECT ************************************ ** CONSTANTS * ************************************ R14SAVE DC F'0' R14 SAVE AREA ( RETURN ADDRESS ) FLAGS DC X'00' FLAGS REGEQU END WAITRDR--
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: PLO instruction Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370,alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 03:42:28 GMT"xarax" writes:
charlie had come up with concept at the science center working on fine-grain smp locking. two issues then were
1) come up with instruction mnemonic that were charlie's initials (CAS) (i.e. compare&swap) and
2) the owners of the pop/architecture "redbook" (this is different than publiished redbooks, it was ox-blood red 3-ring binder that the architecture manual was published in ... sourced from CMS script file with conditionals ... the full manual was the architecture book, the principles of operation was printed from a subset of the architecture book ... parden digression, back to your regularly scheduled programming) insisted that non-SMP use was needed to provide sufficient justification to get it into 370 architecture (aka smp only wasn't sufficient justification for new instruction in 370 architecture) ... and as a result the non-smp, multi-threaded description/examples were invented and were originally part of the programming notes printed as part of the instruction description. these programming notes were then later moved to the appendix.
more detailed past discussion of the subject (including several URLs
to OS390 pop pages):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#58 atomic memory-operation question
other past postings mentioning plo
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#36 What is MVS/ESA?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#16 Minimalist design (was Re: Parity - why even or odd)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#74 Everything you wanted to know about z900 from IBM
general past postings on smp &/or compare&swap:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#smp
other science center postings:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#545tech
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Oldest running code Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 22:43:12 GMT"Roger Bolan" writes:
science center also responsible for the internal network (larger
than arpanet/internet until approx. mid-85) ... some random refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/internet.htm
and cp67/cms (cms was originally cambridge monitor system which was
changed to conversational monitor system when cp67 morphed into
vm/370 ... which begate things like pr/sm, lpars, etc) ... misc
cp/67, vm/370:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#fairshare
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#wsclock
and some microcode specific references:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#mcode
misc. other 4th floor, 545 tech sq
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#545tech
the fine-grain locking work by charlie (also at science center) led to
370 compare&swap (cas are charlie's initials) ... recent compare&swap
posting:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004b.html#57 PLO instruction
science center also did the port of apl\360 to cms for cms\apl ... and
help build the hone system ... which was the world-wide support
infrastructure for all the marketing, sales and field people. in 70s,
when emea hdqtrs moved from ny to paris ... i hand carried system for
installation at new hdqtrs location at la defense (first three bldgs
had gone up, only one had been finished and landscaping was still in
progress, however was able to get RER from downtown) . when japan
wanted clone of the afe hdqtrs system, i hand carried installation to
tokyo. misc. past apl & hone postings:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#hone
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A POX on you, Dennis Ritchie!!! Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:01:22 GMTCBFalconer writes:
CMS shipped with an "update" command that could take a delta deck, merge the delta deck with the original source and produce a temporary file that was actually assembled/compiled.
The "update" command had control cards/records of the form:
./ i nnnnn
insert following cards/records after sequence nnnnn
./ r nnnnn <yyyyy>
replace card(s)/records(s) with sequence nnnn (through yyyyy)
with following cards/records
./ d nnnnn <yyyy>
delete card(s)/record(s) with sequence nnnn (through yyyy)
i was doing so many source changes to CP kernel .. minor recent ref:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004b.html#47 new to mainframe asm
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004b.html#53 origin of UNIX dd command
that i was getting tired of typing in the sequence numbers for the new
source cards/records so I created a pre-processing utility that added
the "$" which would automatically add sequence numbers to new cards
... i.e.
./ i nnnn $ <aaaa <bbb>>
./ r nnnn <yyyy> $ <aaaa <bbb>>
automatically add sequence numbers to inserted cards/records. if no
number is given use default convention
the output of the sequence number utility would then be fed to the update command.
later the support for "$" convention was merged into standard cms update command.
somewhere during the period of doing the l, h, i cp/67 systems (as
part of supporting 370 virtual machines on 360 hardware) minor
recent ref:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2004b.html#31 determining memory size
a set of cms execs were developed that supported cascading updates (and later released as vm/370 source update system). basically there was a CNTRL (control) file that defined the rules for finding (and order of applying) multiple update files. the original exec adopted a convention of filetype of UPDGnnnn (instead of UPDATE) ... where "nnnn" was determined by specific rules. The preprocssor then handled any "$" fields and generated a UPDTnnnn file. Each UPDTnnnn file was then run thru the UPDATE command to combine with the original source. The first such update file was applied to the original source creating a temporary file, subsequent update files were applied to the temporary file until all such update files were applied.
I had archived the whold set of exec/procedure files from CP/67 days
.... replicated on three different tapes. unfortuantely all three
tapes were stored in the same datacenter tape library and some glitch
resulted in all three copies being scratched. minor reference:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#43 Historically important UNIX or computer things.....
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#44 Historically important UNIX or computer things.....
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#12 Tweaking old computers?
fortunately at some point prior to the tapes being scratched, i was
asked to provide a copy of the multilevel update procedures to Melinda
Varian "history" effort ... a previous thread on the subject:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#66 History of project maintenance tools -- what and when?
other postings on the subject:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#39 CMS update
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002p.html#2 IBM OS source code
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#75 History of project maintenance tools -- what and when?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#76 History of project maintenance tools -- what and when?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#77 unix
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#1 History of project maintenance tools -- what and when?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#2 History of project maintenance tools -- what and when?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#6 recent cp67/vm370 walks down memory lane
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#12 Alpha performance, why?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#17 History of project maintenance tools -- what and when?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#18 Could somebody use SCSH, Sheme, or Lisp to create the "Lispm" architecture
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#26 Alpha performance, why?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#13 A Dark Day
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003j.html#45 Hand cranking telephones
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003k.html#10 What is timesharing, anyway?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003k.html#46 Slashdot: O'Reilly On The Importance Of The Mainframe Heritage
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003o.html#68 History of Computer Network Industry
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Paging Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:39:01 GMTRick.Fochtman@ibm-main.clearingcorp.com (Rick Fochtman) writes:
random past paging refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#wsclock
a little drift from old vmshare posting
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=HUMOR94&ft=MEMO#1
oh and a little from original paging game distribution:
.hy off;.ju off :h3.The Paging Game :p.Jeff Berryman, University of British Columbia :h4.Rules--