From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: employee motivation & executive compensation Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:25:30 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
The various bios & refs ... basically refer to boyd having overall strategy for the last desert storm and John Warden having air campaign strategy for desert storm. I think it was MSNBC that had John Warden on as one of the advisers this go around. In the past there have been various URLs around the web comparing Boyd's OODA-loops and some of John Warden's work (some search engines may have any current availability).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Two-factor authentication with SSH? Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:57:11 GMTSøren Roug writes:
In the modern world with online environment and/or prior reliationship between the entity being authenticated and the relying party .... certificates are mostly redundant and superfluous.
3-factor authentication
• something you have (frequently hardware token)
• something you know (pin or password)
• something you are (biometrics)
2-factor authentication can be hardware token and a pin/password that
is used to activate the hardware token. The hardware token can
implement digital signature technology using public/private key pair
where the key pair is generated on the token and the private key is
never allowed to leave the token. The PIN is then used to activate the
token aka just stealing the token isn't sufficient to compromise the
system, and/or just using something like social engineering to obtain
the PIN doesn't directly accomplish anything w/o also stealing the
hardware token.
The issue with regard to non-hardware tokens (aka software envelopes) for private key containers is that vulnerabilities and threats assesements tend to gravitate to independent failure/exploit; the issue with software containers is that they may be easier to steal than pin/passwords ... and so there isn't true independent 2-factor authentication. The difference is especially true when the software container can be copied with no knowledge of the owner ... via-a-vis knowing that a hardware token is missing and will generate lost/stolen report.
There has to be some process that registers the public key ... so that digital signature authentication can be performed. In the case of a CA infrastructure with certificates ... they basically have an RA (or registgration authority) function that performs the public key registration ... and then generates a certificate that can be used to indicate/representation to others that a valid registration has been performed by somebody for some purpose.
However, it is possible for valid businesses to directly perform the public key registration and not be dependent on other parties to perform the function (along with the complexity of what does a certificate really mean). This registration of a public key can use the same business process that registers a password in a shared-secret paradigm.
What is important for 2-factor authentication is totally orthongonal to the existance of a redundant and superfluous certificate ... it is does the registration process actually validate that the public key being registered originates from an hardware token with acceptable integrity characteristics. It is totally independent of whether or not anybody actually bothered to generate a (redundant and superfluous) certificate in response to the registration process .... but did the registration process use the appropriate due diligence with regard to the public key being registered.
disclaimer ... there is now an instantiation of the aads chip strawman
that i originally postulated several years ago:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/x959.html#aads
the comfort level for appropriate 2-factor authentication may be whether due diligence has been taken in validating that the public key being registered (whether it is in an SSH table, or a RADIUS account table, or a Kerberos table, or some other kind of table) actually originated with a hardware token of the appropriate integrity characteristic (regardless of what some certificate might say about the public key).
misc. discussion about relying-party-only certificates and being
redundant and superfluous
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subpubkey.html#rpo
misc discussion regarding 2/3-factor authentication:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm10.htm#bio6 biometrics
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm10.htm#keygen2 Welome to the Internet, here's your private key
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#5 Meaning of Non-repudiation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#6 Meaning of Non-repudiation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#20 IBM alternative to PKI?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm12.htm#10 [3d-secure] 3D Secure and EMV
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm12.htm#24 Interests of online banks and their users [was Re: Cryptogram: Palladium Only for DRM]
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#65 Cryptogram Newsletter is off the wall?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001c.html#39 PKI and Non-repudiation practicalities
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#1 distributed authentication
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#11 FREE X.509 Certificates
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#38 distributed authentication
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#44 Does "Strong Security" Mean Anything?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#49 Are client certificates really secure?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#52 Are client certificates really secure?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#34 A thought on passwords
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#61 I-net banking security
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002c.html#7 Opinion on smartcard security requested
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#18 Opinion on smartcard security requested
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#36 Crypting with Fingerprints ?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#22 Biometric Encryption: the solution for network intruders?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#8 Biometric authentication for intranet websites?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#41 Biometric authentication for intranet websites?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#1 User 2-factor authentication on laptops
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#65 privileged IDs and non-privileged IDs
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#30 Help! Good protocol for national ID card?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#41 META: Newsgroup cliques?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#57 Certificate Authority: Industry vs. Government
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#67 smartcard+fingerprint
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#29 application of unique signature
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Two-factor authentication with SSH? Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 21:15:42 GMTSøren Roug writes:
the registration of the public key at the relying-party ... aka at the site accepting the SSH connection ... rather than a password ... implies that even given knowledge of the public key ... it is not possible to impersonate the entity ... while knowing a shared-secret allows impersonation.
hardware tokens tend to use non-shared-secret paradigms because they tend to offer more protection than shared-secret paradigms. note that there is some additional confusion with the terms password/pin. A password/pin that is registered at a remote site ... is a shared-secret ... a password/pin that is known only to an individual and their privately owned hardware token is not a shared-secret.
there are specific exploits/vulnerabilities with regard to shared-secret and non-shared-secret paradigms. these are somewhat independent of exploits/vulnerabilities with regard to 2/3-factor authentication. They overlap in the sense that a something you know factor can be implemented as either shared-secret ... registered with other parties ... or non-shared-secret (like in hardware tokens where it is not known to other parties).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.arch Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 02:24:51 GMT"Glen Herrmannsfeldt" writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.arch Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 15:13:17 GMTPeter Flass writes:
FS was heavily object as part of the machine instruction level ... as well as one level store. I'm not sure how much of AIX could be considered FS. The as/400 maintained a fairly high-level abstraction and was able to port from a CISC hardware to power/pc RISC hardware with little impact to customers.
in addition to lore that Amdahl left to do 360 pcm, in part
because it appeared that the company would be walking away from 360
with the FS strategy:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#futuresys
there is also some lore that 801/risc in the early to mid 70s was a
re-action to FS ... to go as far as possible to the opposite extreme
by putting as little as possible in the hardware (as opposed to
putting as much as possible in the hardware). Higher level abstraction
could be be provided by software thru the CPr operating system and the
PL.8 programming language ... running on top of minimalist hardware.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#801
then in some sense, as/400 running on power/pc is a convergence of the FS extremes with high level abstraction ... and risc with minimalist hardware.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Name for this early transistor package? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 15:32:31 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
4381 was faster follow-on to 4341. 4361 was follow-on to 4331 ... much slower processor. however, all four were as fast or much faster than 360/67 on which we use to have sub-second trivial response with 75-80 users. some of the change is software bloat (even tho many of these online university 43xx machines were running vm/370, a derivative of cp/67) and some was that they tended to be configured with less disk thruput capcity (aka the argument that relative disk system thruput declined by a factor of ten times between the late 60s and the early 80s, disk thruput improvement was much less than cpu & memory thruput).
gobs of past 4341 & 4381 refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/95.html#3 What is an IBM 137/148 ???
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#1 360/370
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#14 mainframe tcp/ip
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#18 IBM 4381 (finger-check)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#19 IBM 4381 (finger-check)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#34 ... cics ... from posting from another list
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#49 Edsger Dijkstra: the blackest week of his professional life
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#7 IBM S/360
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#36 why is there an "@" key?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#110 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#112 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#123 Speaking of USB ( was Re: ASR 33 Typing Element)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#29 Operating systems, guest and actual
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#90 Ux's good points.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000b.html#37 How to learn assembler language for OS/390 ?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#61 TF-1
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#76 Is a VAX a mainframe?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#83 Is a VAX a mainframe?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#0 Is a VAX a mainframe?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#7 4341 was "Is a VAX a mainframe?"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#9 4341 was "Is a VAX a mainframe?"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#10 4341 was "Is a VAX a mainframe?"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#11 4341 was "Is a VAX a mainframe?"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#12 4341 was "Is a VAX a mainframe?"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#13 4341 was "Is a VAX a mainframe?"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#20 S/360 development burnout?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#82 "all-out" vs less aggressive designs (was: Re: 36 to 32 bit transition)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000e.html#52 Why not an IBM zSeries workstation?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000e.html#53 Why not an IBM zSeries workstation?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000e.html#57 Why not an IBM zSeries workstation?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#69 TSS ancient history, was X86 ultimate CISC? designs)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001.html#21 Disk caching and file systems. Disk history...people forget
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001.html#22 Disk caching and file systems. Disk history...people forget
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001b.html#69 Z/90, S/390, 370/ESA (slightly off topic)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#54 VM & VSE news
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#63 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#65 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#67 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#68 I/O contention
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#9 MIP rating on old S/370s
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#13 High Level Language Systems was Re: computer books/authors (Re: FA:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#2 Mysterious Prefixes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#49 any 70's era supercomputers that ran as slow as today's supercompu
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#29 any 70's era supercomputers that ran as slow as today's supercomputers?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#33 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#35 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#45 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#44 Wired News :The Grid: The Next-Gen Internet?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#76 Other oddball IBM System 360's ?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#2 Most complex instructions (was Re: IBM 9020 FAA/ATC Systems from 1960's)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#3 Most complex instructions (was Re: IBM 9020 FAA/ATC Systems from 1960's)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#13 GETMAIN R/RU (was: An IEABRC Adventure)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#42 Question re: Size of Swap File
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#3 YKYGOW...
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#20 OT - Internet Explorer V6.0
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#48 Pentium 4 SMT "Hyperthreading"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#18 HP-UX will not be ported to Alpha (no surprise)exit
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#14 mainframe question
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#32 mainframe question
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#41 mainframe question
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#53 mainframe question
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#55 mainframe question
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#12 Multics Nostalgia
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#15 departmental servers
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#17 3270 protocol
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#19 3270 protocol
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#56 Contiguous file system
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#15 Replace SNA communication to host with something else
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#39 195 was: Computer Typesetting Was: Movies with source code
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#92 "blocking factors" (Was: Tapes)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#10 index searching
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#11 The demise of compaq
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#52 Microcode?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#0 Microcode?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#2 Microcode? (& index searching)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#10 hollow files in unix filesystems?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#17 index searching
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#20 index searching
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002d.html#7 IBM Mainframe at home
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002d.html#8 Security Proportional to Risk (was: IBM Mainframe at home)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#11 What are some impressive page rates?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#46 What goes into a 3090?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#75 Computers in Science Fiction
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#7 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#8 Is AMD doing an Intel?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#13 Hardware glitches, designed in and otherwise
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#20 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#23 Computers in Science Fiction
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#60 Mainframes and "mini-computers"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#44 ibm icecube -- return of watercooling?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#52 Bettman Archive in Trouble
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#7 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#9 More about SUN and CICS
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#12 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#19 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#22 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#23 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#27 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#29 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#30 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#37 IBM was: CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#43 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#4 HONE, , misc
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#7 HONE, , misc
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#67 Total Computing Power
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#1 misc. old benchmarks (4331 & 11/750)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#3 misc. old benchmarks (4331 & 11/750)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#4 misc. old benchmarks (4331 & 11/750)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#9 Avoiding JCL Space Abends
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#58 IBM S/370-168, 195, and 3033
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#59 IBM S/370-168, 195, and 3033
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#63 Help me find pics of a UNIVAC please
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#1 Home mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#16 Home mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#28 TPF
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#51 E-mail from the OS-390 ????
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#74 They Got Mail: Not-So-Fond Farewells
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002p.html#48 Linux paging
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002p.html#59 AMP vs SMP
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#27 Beyond 8+3
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#29 Collating on the S/360-2540 card reader?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#10 Mainframe System Programmer/Administrator market demand?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#14 vax6k.openecs.org rebirth
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#15 vax6k.openecs.org rebirth
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#67 3745 & NCP Withdrawl?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#29 360/370 disk drives
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#17 difference between itanium and alpha
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#19 difference between itanium and alpha
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#23 difference between itanium and alpha
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#71 Tubes in IBM 1620?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#77 COMTEN- IBM networking boxes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#79 COMTEN- IBM networking boxes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#0 big buys was: Tubes in IBM 1620?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#24 CPU Impact of degraded I/O
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#33 Why only 24 bits on S/360?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#35 Why only 24 bits on S/360?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#61 Another light on the map going out
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#64 IBM was: VAX again: unix
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#56 Reviving Multics
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#65 801 (was Re: Reviving Multics
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#5 Alpha performance, why?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#48 Alpha performance, why?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#50 Alpha performance, why?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#56 ECPS:VM DISPx instructions
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#22 303x, idals, dat, disk head settle, and other rambling folklore
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.arch Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 20:20:58 GMTJohn Ahlstrom writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.arch Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 00:00:38 GMToh, and some slight drift
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:58:57 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: IBM system 370 Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370,alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 12:18:04 GMT"Dean Kent" writes:
late 70s/early 80s there was a project to switch the large number of
different micro-code engines to 801/risc ... including the low-end and
mid-range 370 (aka like for the follow-on to the 4341) .. which
eventually got killed (although there are a number of 801/risc chips
as support processors in various places today). there has been a related
mainframe thread playing out in comp.arch & a.f.c.:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#3 A Dark Day
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#4 A Dark Day
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#6 A Dark Day
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#7 A Dark Day
some past refs to migrating all the corporate micro-engines to 801/risc:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#136a checks (was S/390 on PowerPC?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#60 "all-out" vs less aggressive designs (was: Re: 36 to 32 bit transition)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#43 Golden Era of Compilers
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#69 Very CISC Instuctions (Was: why the machine word size ...)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#39 "Soul of a New Machine" Computer?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#70 Pipelining in the past
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#19 PowerPC Mainframe?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#63 Sizing the application
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#81 McKinley Cometh
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#20 MVS on Power (was Re: McKinley Cometh...)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#14 Z/OS--anything new?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#61 Who wrote the obituary for John Cocke?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#6 Who wrote the obituary for John Cocke?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#2 vax6k.openecs.org rebirth
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#3 vax6k.openecs.org rebirth
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#5 Card Columns
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#7 what is the difference between ALU & FPU
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#43 IBM says AMD dead in 5yrs ... -- Microsoft Monopoly vs. IBM
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#55 Reviving Multics
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#56 Reviving Multics
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#56 ECPS:VM DISPx instructions
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: IBM system 370 Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370,alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 15:29:04 GMT"Rupert Pigott" writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Columbia U Computing History - New stuff Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.protocols.kermit.misc Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 15:32:59 GMT"Douglas H. Quebbeman" writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Which monitor for Fujitsu Micro 16s? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 15:59:03 GMTshoppa@trailing-edge.com (Tim Shoppa) writes:
all I had was a short description and the actual running binary from the 1401 ... but no actual code. I got to design the complete monitor from scratch, all the feature/function, device drivers, storage management, tasking, i/o interface, etc. and write all the code. The requirement was that it produce the same tape from cards that the 1401 version would produce ... out from tape to punch/printer the same as the 1401 version.
the next was cp/67 (control program 67) and cms (cambridge monitor
system) from the people at 4th floor, 545 tech sq ... in part because
they shipped all the complete source ... and I could rewrite any piece
of it. misc 545 refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#545tech
os/360 was a little more difficult since you didn't have the capability for rebuilding the whole system from the original source ... although component like HASP ... had the complete source and allowed some amount of latitude.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 12:20:31 GMTbbreynolds@aol.comedxedl (Bruce B. Reynolds) writes:
random past refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001b.html#76 Disks size growing while disk count shrinking = bad performance
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#57 Whom Do Programmers Admire Now???
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#66 History of project maintenance tools -- what and when?
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: instant messaging Newsgroups: alt.os.multics Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 12:29:43 GMTTom Van Vleck writes:
when ed (at csc) did internal network support, vnet/rscs, the support
was added to propagate the instant message command thru the network ...
so instead of
msg userid abcd....
it became
msg vnet msg nodeid userid abcd.....
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: two pi, four phase, 370 clone Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 20:44:09 GMTtwo pi was a 370 clone manufactur ... a subsidiary of phillips. In the spring of 1980 there were 120 relogoed two pi systems installed as NCSS 3200 and 100 two pi systems. NCSS was a cp/67 time-sharing service bureau that had been formed in the summer of 1968 by some people from cambridge science center and others.
doing some search engine of two pi ....
brief mention of two pi in a bio:
http://www.tracecenter.org/docs/fccadv/report990430.txt
http://wireless.oldcolo.com/course/dewayne.txt
two-pi acquired by four-phase, feb. 1981:
http://www.four-phase.org/pictures/EricFernandez/scratch%20pack%202-81.pdf
the above mentions bill ferguson having ten year anniversary with four-phase
I still have to check to see if it is the same bill ferguson who i ran into at RSA conference 3-4 years ago, marketing keykos
general four phase alumni site:
http://www.four-phase.org/
misc. keykos refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#69 TSS ancient history, was X86 ultimate CISC? designs)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001b.html#73 7090 vs. 7094 etc.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#33 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#35 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#10 TSS/360
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#59 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#0 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#4 markup vs wysiwyg (was: Re: learning how to use a computer)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#43 IBM doing anything for 50th Anniv?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#63 Hercules and System/390 - do we need it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#75 30th b'day
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#41 Segments, capabilities, buffer overrun attacks
misc ncss refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#10 IBM S/360
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#59 Blinkenlights
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#51 Author seeks help - net in 1981
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#55 TSS/360
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002c.html#44 cp/67 (coss-post warning)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#63 Hercules and System/390 - do we need it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#69 Hercules and System/390 - do we need it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#56 10 choices that were critical to the Net's success
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002m.html#61 The next big things that weren't
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002p.html#37 Newbie: Two quesions about mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#15 CA-RAMIS
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#17 CA-RAMIS
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#68 unix
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#72 cp/67 35th anniversary
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: instant messaging Newsgroups: alt.os.multics Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 20:42:05 GMTTom Van Vleck writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Spam Bomb Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 12:08:36 GMTi would claim that the internet is common infrastructure, somewhat akin to the highway system (and some of the past information superhighway analogies). huge numbers of people contribute to the financing of the common infrastructure ... and it is possible for individuals to abuse their share of the infrastructure ... akin to 18-wheelers abusing the highway network.
In part, this is because that actual use is hardly metered, and therefor it is possible to design strategies (like spam) where actual use is one hundred times or more larger than the direct financial contribution to their share of the internet (aka fully loaded cost of huge spamming is more than 100 times larger than the price charged the spammers). One might make the analogy to people growing rice in a desert ecology because the price they pay for water is less than one cent on the dollar of the cost of providing the water.
Somebody claiming to have spewed out over 200 million spams per day (120 million spams per 12 hrs) is analogous (but multiplied by factor of 100 or more) to "overloaded" trucks on the nations highways ... threatening the infrastructure integrity because of the excessive payloads.
some discussion of highway costs being directly proportional to
18-wheeler loading (even tho cost of building and supporting highways
is amortized across all vehicles ... and not strictly levied only on
18-wheelers)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#41 Transportation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#42 Transportation
so there is strictly ingres loading restrictions .... with enormous fines and loss of driving privileges for threatening the integrity of the internet infrastructure (and some analogy for compliance like truck weighing stations).
other discussions of spam and/or the internet "wild west"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm14.htm#13 A Trial Balloon to Ban Email?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm14.htm#14 blackhole spam => mail unreliability (Re: A Trial Balloon to Ban Email?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm14.htm#15 blackhole spam => mail unreliability (Re: A Trial Balloon to Ban Email?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm14.htm#17 Payments as an answer to spam (addenda)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm14.htm#18 Payments as an answer to spam (addenda)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm14.htm#19 Payments as an answer to spam (addenda)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm14.htm#20 Payments as an answer to spam (addenda)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aepay11.htm#33 Spam's Being Used For Identity Theft And Blackmail, Symantec Says
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#27 Internet like city w/o traffic rules, traffic signs, traffic lights and traffic enforcement
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#28 Internet like city w/o traffic rules, traffic signs, traffic lights and traffic enforcement
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#29 Internet like city w/o traffic rules, traffic signs, traffic lights and traffic enforcement
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#30 Internet like city w/o traffic rules, traffic signs, traffic lights and traffic enforcement
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#31 Internet like city w/o traffic rules, traffic signs, traffic lights and traffic enforcement
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | lynn@garlic.com - https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia, 20th anniv: https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: MVS 3.8... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 12:41:44 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
the internal network started doing computer conference in the early
'80s using mailing list technology (i've been blamed in the past for
being responsible for some of it) ... which evolved into listserv on
bitnet/earn and now have similar things on other platforms (listserv,
majordomo, etc). in the early to mid-80s something called toolsrun
evolved on the internal network that shared many of the
characteristics of usenet ... with the ibmpc conference getting large
amounts of traffic. minor toolsrun refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001c.html#5 what makes a cpu fast
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002d.html#33 LISTSERV(r) on mainframes
bitnet mailing lists are where many of the mainframe oriented conferencing started. many of them are now gatewayed to usenet in the bit.listserv. hierarchy, although there are misc. other usenet groups like comp.lang.asm370 and comp.os.tpf. bit.listserv.ibm-main is quite active.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: smp 2.4.20-13.9 ext3fs problems? Newsgroups: redhat.kernel.general Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 13:43:39 GMTi just tried smp 2.4.20-13.9 and almost immediately after boot & login ... started getting a whole bunch of ext3fs error messages on a scsi (hardware) disk array. I rebooted to 20.4.20-9 ... and it cleaned stuff up and seems to have recovered w/o any problem.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: IBM says AMD dead in 5yrs ... -- Microsoft Monopoly vs. IBM monopoly Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 14:34:12 GMTWilliam Hamblen writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Spam Bomb Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 19:11:21 GMTref:
aka ... effectively the cost of building and maintaining roads is based on use/loading by heavy trucks. a majority of that cost is underwritten by fuel tax against everybody. However, if the costs were really born by the entities responsible for the cost ... then the fuel tax would be removed from all but heavy trucking ... and the tax for heavy trucking possibly increased to $20/gal (in order to accurately reflect direct cause and effect between the reasons for the costs and the payment of the costs).
Now, things that are heavily transportation related, like food distribution, could see significant price increases. However, again, this is akin to zero sum budgeting ... everything that directly incurs costs are directly charged proportional to the cost incurred. aka ... the current amortizing of road costs across all vehicles heavily subsidizes heavy trucking as well as products heavily dependent on heavy trucking.
so doing similar analysis with regard to spamming. Lets say the current infrastructure has 60 million accounts paying $20/month plus another $5/month amortized consumer computer related purchases .. for a total of $25/month or maybe $1.5b/month.
Hypothetically, lets say that spammers are consumming on the order of 25 percent of that infrastructure ... or roughtly equivalent to $375m/month ... mostly attributable to the top ten spammers. Using direct prorated charging ... those ten spammers should be each charged $37.5m/month (along with a corresponding reduction in the end-user monthly cost).
For argument sake, lets say that the spammers are actually being charged on the order of $5k/month (or less) rather than $37.5m/month and possibly are earning maybe $50k/month. In effect, to clear possibly $40k/nmonth or less, they are taking advantage of other peoples' resources to the tune of nearly $40m/month .... aka they are in effect burning $1000 of other people's money for every dollar they are realizing. This is an horrendously, enormous inefficiency ... and has no plausable economic benefit to the overall industry.
In effect, they are doing it because they can.
In the heavy trucking industry ... they may only be subsidized to the tune of 10:1 .... aka other entities are paying $20 (to build roads that are heavy truck capable) for every $1 earned in the trucking industry. Now even with such heavy subsidy, there are still instances where entities try and take further advantage of the infrastructure, like heavily overloaded trucks that create real threats to the integrity of the infrastructure. This gives rise to at least the weigh stations to try and curb the worst abuse.
The issue in the ISP industry is that the cost of the weigh-station equivalent probably can't be born by the spamming industry. While they may be creating the economic burden on the infrastructure to the tune of $375m/month ... they possibly are only bringing in $500k/month (this is the horrible, nearly 1000 to one, mismatch between the burden that they are placing on the infrastructure vis-a-vis the limited economic benefit realized from such activities).
In the heavy trucking world ... a subsidy of ten-to-one is possibly deamed tolerable because it achieves indirect subsidies of other (possibly desirable) objectives (that happen to be transportion related), like cheap(er) food. However, it is hard to understand a subsidy infrastructure of something like thousand-to-one with no observable general benefit.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: tankers and computers Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 20:52:09 GMTMorten Reistad writes:
i recently ran across somewhat cryptic domain name in my web log ... looking it up, it turned out to be from a norwegian company that builds deep sea oil drilling rigs.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 19:37:59 GMTbob smith writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: AT&T versus Treating customers right Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 05:26:59 GMTCBFalconer writes:
I can easily derive it: Stamp 0.37 10 mins data entry @ 10/hr 1.66 Office boy 2 mins @ 6/hr .20 ==== 2.23 Overhead at 500% 11.15 ===== Cost of billing 13.38 and I kid you not on the overhead figure. The gazillions for the CEO and other thieves are only a small portion of that.since pre-paid was mentioned ... it is possible that they were also including the part of processing the payment and the whole data processing infrastructure to match a remittance against a billed account (aka billing implies processing a payment). There is also the infrastructure that is tracking what needs to be billed ... which also can go away with pre-paid cards.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:15:40 GMTjmfbahciv writes:
this created huge traffic jams in the morning going north at cochran where it narrowed from six to four lanes and in the evening going south at bernal where it narrowed. for several years this added something like 15 minutes to the morning and evening compute for possibly tens of thousands of people ... say 30minutes/day, 20k people, 10khours/day @ $10/hr, something like $100k/day people costs, $2.3m/month, $28m/year (much higher if use $100/hr). There was some suggestion that the state send a bill for the additional people costs to the public lobbying group each month.
last week there was big celibration that the coyote valley section was retrofitted with the two additional lanes at enormous additional cost (compared to it having been built at six lanes to begin with).
san jose's light rail is another issue. the original specs called for break-even use volumes based on elapsed commute times being dependent on light rail having off-grade crossings .... aka light rail didn't have to share intersections with automobiles. however, somewhere along the way, there was a decision to save on construction costs by not implementing off-grade crossings at numerous places. This resulted in significant increase in transit time (people in south valley commuting to computer businesses like intel, amd, etc) ... making it much less attractive as a commuting method (which adds more cars to the intersections, slowing things down even more).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: AT&T versus Treating customers right Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:21:53 GMTjmfbahciv writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: instant messaging Newsgroups: alt.os.multics Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:47:56 GMTcstacy@dtpq.com (Christopher C. Stacy) writes:
a facility was then created where a program could specify the capture of instant messages (actually all messages). This was used by vnet/rscs on the internal network to capture:
msg vnet msg nodeid userid ...
and provide instant messaging across the network.
It was also used to implement the early automated operator programs in the 70s (capturing all messages and automating various operator functions) ... well before the hllapi stuff on PCs capturing 3270 data sreams.
the author of rex(x) also used the facility to implement a multi-user space war game. basically, the program drove the 3270 screen, enabled programmed message interception and communicated with others via the instant messaging mechanism. It included the (internal) syntax for both local users ... via "msg userid" and remote users via "msg vnet msg nodeid userid".
misc. past space war refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#10 5-player Spacewar?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#26 Help needed on conversion from VM to OS390
the author of CMS pipelines also used it in the "toy program" ... see
description towards the end of following post:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#4a John Hartmann's Birthday Party
it was also possible to "spool" all messages, effectively capture all
incoming and outgoing keystrokes in a file. In the early '80s, for
nine months, I had all of email and instant messages captured as part
of a study on computer mediated communication ... which turned into a
stanford phd thesis comparing my different communication patterns
(telephone, face-to-face, email, and instant messaging). misc. refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#cmc
the 20th anniversity of adding the 1000th node to the internal network
is comming up june 10th (aka the internal network was larger than the
arpa/inter net until about mid-85):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#112 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/internet.htm#22 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Offshore IT Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 14:25:25 GMTdoug@BKASSOCIATES.NET (Doug Fuerst) writes:
basically, the govs. examined the work/value proposition and made a specific policy decision to discourage all industries where the value of the work was less than the target standard of living (not what the workers were paid, but what the value of their work was) and concentrate on encouraging industries where the work value could sustain the target standard of living ... modulo industries deamed strategic (which effectively would have to be subsidized).
in the early '90s ... at the leading edge of the internet revolution, there was some report published that half of the advanced degree technical area graduates from US universities were non-US ... and there were a number of areas where it might be 80-90 percent non-US. related studies from census and others in the early '90s made claims like entry level college text books had been dumbed down three times between the 60s and the early 90s ... and that half of the (us) 18 year olds were functionally illiterate.
Some of the problems were temporarily masked during the 90s where high school kids could get high paying computer jobs and could skip getting advanced education. However, as things contracted it starts to become much more of an issue of are there enuf people that are skilled enuf to do the jobs. It is not just a pay issue ... but also a skill issue.
there were some jokes about the whole US high-tech industry was being proped up by foreign workers and that the US k12 education system was starting to take on some characteristics of 3rd world country. If the high-tech industry was being proped up by foreign workers, working in the US, then it wasn't all that far of a stretch to start looking at foreign workers working in foreign countries.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: electronic-ID and key-generation Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 14:48:06 GMTPaul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> writes:
One could postulate that a number of these cards/chips also implement RSA digital signatures as opposed to DSA or ECDSA for the same reason, RSA infrastructure use of random numbers can be defined as noches as part of messages from an external source. DSA/ECDSA require random number as part of the actual signing process (as well as part of key generation).
the aads chip strawman specified a ECDSA key-pair that was generated
in the chip:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/x959.html#aads
and the private key never leaves the chip and is never divulged. The implication is that the key generation and the signing process requires a fairly robust random number generation implementation in the chip.
This is part of a certificate-less, non-PKI public key infrastructure.
where the key-pair is generated during power-on/test in the chip fab
(before the wafer is even sliced & diced). The objective is to bind
the integrity characteristics of the chip to the public key ... aka
can you say with any degree of certainty the real integrity
characteristics of any chip inside a 7616 carrier embedded in a piece
of plastic?
... I may have no idea who has the card ... but given that a specific public key authenticates a digital signature produced by the card ... some assumption can be made about the integrity level of the environment that produced that digital signature.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 01:24:01 GMTPeter Flass writes:
how 'bout 3275 terminal ... slightly related:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#57 Why did they make FORTRAN so hard to parse?
misc. 3272/3274 references ...
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001b.html#83 Z/90, S/390, 370/ESA (slightly off topic)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#17 3270 protocol
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#19 3270 protocol
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#6 IBM 327x terminals and controllers (was Re: Itanium2 power
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Offshore IT Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 01:28:11 GMTPeter Flass writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 13:50:51 GMTBrian Inglis writes:
somewhat after the time the internal network exceeded 1000 nodes, the
mvs jes limitation was raised to 999 nodes. the 20th aniv. of the
1000th node on the internal network is coming up. 10jun2003 ref:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#112 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/internet.htm#22 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
the other reason that real mvs jes nje could be trusted as an intermediate node (or even barely any kind of node) was that nje header jumbled bunch of networking and non-networking together ... which led to imcompatibilities between different releases of mvs jes ... and system crashes.
the base internal networking that started it all was vnet/rscs which had its own native drivers ... but because of the way it layered things, it could also run multiple different kinds of nje drivers. this was leveraged to have lots of jes nje release specific drivers that did canonical nje header rewrites ... aka ... when vnet had a direct connection to a real mvs jes system ... the appropriate nje driver in vnet was started to try and minimize mvs crashes due to incompatible headers.
by the time bitnet started ... it appeared that the only drivers
shipping to vnet customers where standard nje drivers. this possibly
minimizedq the negative comparison of native nje compared to native
vnet ... and of course it couldn't work the other way around ... jes
ever running vnet drivers ... this was a really novel concept to vnet
from the beginning ... and didn't even show up in arpanet until 1/1/83
cut-over to ip protocol. misc. bitnet/earn
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#bitnet
as to disk error recover ... when i started playing in the disk
engineering lab ... mvs had a 15 minute mtbf if brought up in
environmnet with engineering "test cell". It was a year or so
rewriting input/output supervisor to be absolutely bullet proof
... nothing a engineering device could do resulted in system crash.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#disk
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned ... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 14:13:25 GMT"Rupert Pigott" writes:
the disk transfer rate has gone up significantly ... but the increase in 4k accesses per second hasn't increased that much. can two current 20gbyte disks do more 4k operations per second than 16 3380 disks.
in part, the programming and use patterns over the last 20 or so years have had to change to accommodate the change in the relationship of relative thruput of different parts of system (lot more attention to caching and large contiguous block transfer).
3380 had avg. access of 16mills (arm+rotational delay) ... you might have current drives at 1/2 to 1/4th that ... so two current drives would have 4-8 times thruput of a single 3380 ... but possibly only 1/8th the aggregate thruput of 16 3380 drives.
some 4381 processor speed numbers (i.e. faster/later 4381 about the
same as 370/168-3):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#12 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#27 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#58 IBM S/370-168, 195, and 3033
ye old 67/3081 comparison reference (if disk technology had kept pace
with processor and memory, 3081 should be supporting 50 times as many
users as 67, not four times):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/93.html#31 Big I/O or Kicking the Mainframe out the Door
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/95.html#10 Virtual Memory (A return to the past?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#46 The god old days(???)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#4 IBM S/360
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#62 any 70's era supercomputers that ran as slow as today's supercomputers?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#40 MVS History (all parts)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#61 MVS History (all parts)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#23 Smallest Storage Capacity Hard Disk?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#5 index searching
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#11 Microcode? (& index searching)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#20 index searching
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#8 What are some impressive page rates?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#9 What are some impressive page rates?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#16 AS/400 and MVS - clarification please
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#58 IBM S/370-168, 195, and 3033
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#21 vax6k.openecs.org rebirth
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#21 PDP10 and RISC
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#50 Alpha performance, why?
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned ... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 14:30:53 GMTEric Smith <eric-no-spam-for-me@brouhaha.com> writes:
reference to an old post from 1984 in a computer conference (century
forum) discussing date issues coming up in 2000 ... specifically with
respect to fixing a "date" problem in the MTU box on the shuttle
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#24 BA Solves Y2K (Was: Re: Chinese Solve Y2K)
obsolete is normally not just that it is old ... but whether or not it can do the job ... and/or whether it can be done cheaper/better some other way. replacing with something bright, shiny, new is somewhat akin to disposible generation and needing a new automobile every year.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: electronic-ID and key-generation Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:07:01 GMT"Peter Gullberg" writes:
lots of govs. and financial instutions have chips under armed guards until after personalization ... and sometimes even up until delivery of the card to the end-entity. conjecture that this is at least possibly because of possible exploits involving substituting couterfeit chips for the real ones (even before chips are embedded in the 7816 carrier ... it is somewhat problematical that eyeball examination of a chip can tell real ones from counterfeit).
all the trouble with the armed guards .... making sure that a counterfeit chip can't be substituted for a real one ... and then they let a person carry it around in their wallet ... or leave it on their desk. the govs and other institutions want to know that there is some level of integrity and trust with using the method of electronic authentication. that involves some aspect about the trust and integrity of the individual components. as a result they tend to specify things like EAL5-high certifications.
some manufactur may claim that they have gotten an EAL5-high certification for a specific chip .... but that typically involves only a dozen chips. Then some claim is made that the thing that you might be carrying around in your wallet is in any way similar to the dozen or so chips that were actually evaluated. they tend to specify extremely tamper-resistant components .... lots of attention that the readers at security checkpoints haven't been compromised ... or that ATM cash machines are armored and under surveillance. That still leaves something of a gaping hole about whether the card in your hand contains a real chip or a copy chip.
There are very significant issues with regard to non-repudiation ... whether or not the key-pair was generated on-chip, is possibly one of the least significant.
In general for electronic id .... they want to know that the process has some high level of integrity and trust .... aka high-security biometric readers under constant surveillance and some degree of confidence that you can't duplicate the biometric readings. The whole issue isn't whether or not you can't (re)generate a new biometric reading (rather than the one you got at the factory) ... but whether the reading is consistently reliable. copy/counterfeit chips are somewhat similar to fake fingers or fake eyeballs or readers that have been compromised and give wrong readings.
The real issue isn't whether or not you generated your own key .... it includes whether or not the card you are presenting does really contain a chip with the acceptable integrity characteristics ... and can be trusted.
previous post
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#29 electronicc-ID and key-generation
whole bunch of posts with regard to non-repudiation:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm10.htm#cfppki15 CFP: PKI research workshop
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm10.htm#cfppki18 CFP: PKI research workshop
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm10.htm#paiin PAIIN security glossary & taxonomy
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#5 Meaning of Non-repudiation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#6 Meaning of Non-repudiation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#7 Meaning of Non-repudiation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#11 Meaning of Non-repudiation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#12 Meaning of Non-repudiation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#13 Words, Books, and Key Usage
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#14 Meaning of Non-repudiation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm12.htm#5 NEWS: 3D-Secure and Passport
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm12.htm#30 Employee Certificates - Security Issues
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm12.htm#37 Legal entities who sign
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm12.htm#38 Legal entities who sign
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm12.htm#59 e-Government uses "Authority-stamp-signatures"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#57 RealNames hacked. Firewall issues.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001c.html#39 PKI and Non-repudiation practicalities
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001c.html#41 PKI and Non-repudiation practicalities
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#11 FREE X.509 Certificates
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#38 distributed authentication
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#37 Security Issues of using Internet Banking
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#69 Digital signature
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#68 Are you really who you say you are?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#67 Does Diffie-Hellman schema belong to Public Key schema family?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#77 Does Diffie-Hellman schema belong to Public Key schema family?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#40 Beginner question on Security
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002m.html#38 Convenient and secure eCommerce using POWF
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#16 Help! Good protocol for national ID card?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#19 Help! Good protocol for national ID card?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#19 Message (authentication/integrity); was: Re: CRC-32 collision
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#29 Message (authentication/integrity); was: Re: CRC-32 collision
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#37 unix
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#29 application of unique signature
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#38 entity authentication with non-repudiation
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: electronic-ID and key-generation Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:30:59 GMT"Peter Gullberg" writes:
basically electronic-ID is authentication. authentication boils down
to one or more of:
• something you have (tokens)
• something you know (secrets)
• something you are (biometrics)
chips supposedly are used in tokens to allow verification of the token
to be done electronically ... and plausibly also to make it harder to
counterfeit the token. The reason that gov. and financial institutions
specify things like EAL5-high certification is that they really want
it to be difficult to counterfeit tokens (also why they frequently
have armed guards during transport from chip fabrication to
personalization center).
the issue is, given the overall infrastructure, to what degree of certainty can the institution really believe its you? this not only involves things like exploits counterfeiting one or more of the three authentication methods .... but also the whole infrastructure that takes part in verifying the authentication information.
for instance, x9.84 standard for biometrics .... has issues with biometrics values .... when they effectively are used in shared-secret mode (aka central registrty, remote matching, etc) that they have the highest level of security. evesdropping a biometric value and later being able to electronically reproduce the biometric signal (as in shared-secret) opens the infrastructure up to impersonation (aka it is much easier to change a compromized PIN that it is to change a compromized thumb print).
so a real issue with buying off-the-shelf card and doing your own key generation ... has little or nothing to do with key gen ... it has to do with how can the institution trust a user presented token as part of something you have authentication (aka as in the key is suppose to be a unique representation of the token ... as opposed to the key having some unique intrinsic magical value of its own). This is in the context of institutions that nominally require armed guards as part of addressing exploits associated with copy/counterfeit chips being injected into the environment.
past posts:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#29 electronic-ID and key-generation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#35 electronic-ID and key-generation
misc armed guards &/or counterfeit/copy chips
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm3.htm#cstech12 cardtech/securetech & CA PKI
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm3.htm#kiss9 KISS for PKIX .... password/digital signature
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aepay3.htm#x959risk4 Risk Management in AA / draft X9.59
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#54 Does "Strong Security" Mean Anything?
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Whatever happened to 'University Computer Centers'? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 19:45:03 GMTJoe Morris writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 20:59:14 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Calculations involing very large decimals Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 21:40:57 GMT"David Wade" writes:
somewhere in the back of my mind was the stuff leading up to change in the password mask used by cp/67 on 2741 ... basically which three characters to print for the mask and whether more than three was needed ... but i'm having a hard time drudging the discussion up from memory.
i just checked an old cp/67 manual and there is no mention there of the mask.
so quick check of vmshare archive ...
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/
there is related discussion with regard to "password blotting" on
glass ttys
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=ASCIPSWD&ft=PROB&args=password+mask#hit
mask with apl:
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=CNY010DK&ft=NOTE&args=password+mask#hit
misc. other discussions from vmshare archive:
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=NOECHO&ft=PROB&args=password+mask#hit
there are misc. other discussions related to password masking in the vmshare archives.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: graceful recovery when runs out of paging? Newsgroups: redhat.kernel.general Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:14:50 GMTi'm running rh9 on dual 1ghz with gig of memory and gig of paging defined. typically there is 400-500mbyte memory and couple k of paging. mozilla (at least 1.4b) seems to have some sort of memory leak ... i was pushing mozilla pretty hard and things were getting slower and slower ... looked at the monitor and everything was full (1gig of memory and 1gig of paging) ... and not too long later everything locked up/stopped and i eventually had to force hardware reset and reboot.
I would have preferred it giving me some opportunity to kill mozilla.
i've since doubled page space (which just means that it would take a little longer for mozilla to fill it up) ... and have taken to periodically killing/restarting mozilla when it seems to getting too stressed.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 02:53:08 GMTCBFalconer writes:
there were stories about east coast railroads that highlighted that during the 50s & 60s there were significant executive bonuses and stock dividends at the same time there was something like 20 years worth of deferred (aka no) track maintenance.
couple past posts on the subject:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#75 Apology to Cloakware (open letter)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#7 Big Brother -- Re: National IDs
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned ... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 03:03:47 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
The economics were somewhat ... take a $5million dollar computing installation; if you spent an extra $100k on regular disks ... and only kept each disk partially full, you could get an extra 20 percent thruput. Saving the $100k on the extra disks ... translated effectively into 20 percent overall loss (lower total system thruput) of the $5million dollar investment ... or approx. $1m.
To make it work, it had to be an official product that was marketed as a fast 3380 for more money than a regular 3380 (even tho it only had 25 percent the capacity).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.arch Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:33:18 GMT"John R. Strohm" writes:
we managed to collect a lot of HYPERchannel gear from one source or another. Some of the stuff that nominally were adatpers for DEC or Crays just went into the warehouse.
In the late 80s we were spending some amount of time talking to (ut austin) balcones research (out on burnet past research) that had a cray (and some number of vaxes) and managed to convince some bean counters that we could donate a bunch of the stuff from the warehouse to balcones.
this is also about the time I did the rfc 1044 support
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcidx3.htm#1044
for the mainframe tcp/ip product and was doing some tuning at cray research.
last time i was back at UT austin ... was for my youngest graduation.
Several months ago I had a tour of the SLAC machine room ... which used to be filled to overflowing with mainframe gear. Now it is about half empty. There are several rows of racks .... each rack having a whole slew of linux boxes, each row is labeled with its grid cluster name.
random rfc 1044 refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/93.html#28 Log Structured filesystems -- think twice
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#14 mainframe tcp/ip
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#15 tcp/ip
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/96.html#17 middle layer
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#34 ... cics ... from posting from another list
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#49 Edsger Dijkstra: the blackest week of his professional life
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#50 Edsger Dijkstra: the blackest week of his professional life
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#36 why is there an "@" key?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#123 Speaking of USB ( was Re: ASR 33 Typing Element)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#90 Ux's good points.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000c.html#59 Does the word "mainframe" still have a meaning?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#30 OT?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#63 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#65 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#52 Pre ARPAnet email?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#33 Did AT&T offer Unix to Digital Equipment in the 70s?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#44 Wired News :The Grid: The Next-Gen Internet?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#20 OT - Internet Explorer V6.0
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#11 The demise of compaq
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#43 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002i.html#45 CDC6600 - just how powerful a machine was it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#67 Total Computing Power
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#31 general networking is: DEC eNet: was Vnet : Unbelievable
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#58 IBM S/370-168, 195, and 3033
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#51 E-mail from the OS-390 ????
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#27 Beyond 8+3
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003.html#67 3745 & NCP Withdrawl?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#29 360/370 disk drives
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#44 filesystem structure, was tape format (long post)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#28 difference between itanium and alpha
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#77 COMTEN- IBM networking boxes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#79 COMTEN- IBM networking boxes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#33 Why only 24 bits on S/360?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#35 Why only 24 bits on S/360?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#37 Why only 24 bits on S/360?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#59 unix
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: graceful recovery when runs out of paging? Newsgroups: redhat.kernel.general Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:49:02 GMTSundial Services writes:
i've reported about mozilla issue before ... it was also in (at least 1.3) ... it involves possibly 80-100 different windows in tabs ... it also periodically locks up some of the tabs (tab can't be killed or go away w/o killing mozilla). Each window is at least well under a mbyte (if not 100k) ... but easily gets going and mozilla hits 400-500 meg and then things start slowing down (whatever it is doing takes a lot of cpu also).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Offshore IT Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,bit.listserv.ibm-main Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:37:56 GMT"Howard Brazee" writes:
the other was that half of the advanced degree graduates in technical areas were non-us.
the combination was observations that non-us workers were significantly proping up the high-tech industry expansion during the '90s (because us workers didn't have sufficient numbers with the necessary skills).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 17:41:13 GMTgenew@mail.ocis.net (Gene Wirchenko) writes:
there were a couple summers when I was much younger that we hiked from
stehekin (opposite end of lake chelan) to the canadian border and back
(this was before the north cascades highway went in).
http://www.lakechelan.com/
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned ... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 17:52:30 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned ... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 18:03:49 GMT"David Wade" writes:
the data record (that is to be written/replaced) is first read and the corresponding parity record for that stripe is read, the original data record is "subtracted" from the parity record, the parity record is then updated with the new value to be written ... then both the data record and the parity record are written back out.
This is avoided if you are going to write all records in the stripe, then the new parity record value can be directly calculated and everything written at one time.
with cheap drives, for transaction stuff ... it is possible to just have two-way mirror ... can give twice the read thruput ... and with both drives written in parallel, is no worse than non-mirror on writes (modulo some additional bus bandwidth).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Whatever happened to 'University Computer Centers'? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 17:45:07 GMTjchausler writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 17:49:17 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Oldest running software. Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 18:52:36 GMThancock4@bbs.cpcn.com (Jeff nor Lisa) writes:
350/50s & 360/65s had ROS for 360 architecture and 7090 architecture.
somebody has previously posted table or some 360 ROS features here within the past year or two (but can't find the reference at the moment)
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: HSM Functionality for Microsoft, using the Mainframe as the repository Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 19:58:17 GMTjalvarez@CASYC.ES (Chema Alvarez) writes:
misc. past refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#66 Holy Satanism! Re: Hyper-Threading Technology - Intel information.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#3 IBM's "old" boss speaks (was "new")
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#10 Deleting files and emails at Arthur Andersen and Enron
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#29 Computers in Science Fiction
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#25 Beyond 8+3
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#43 VMFPLC2 tape format
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#9 IBM says AMD dead in 5yrs ... -- Microsoft Monopoly vs. IBM
backup/archive posts
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#backup
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 23:50:57 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
HSM on mvs originated circa mid-70s. following historical reference says
1978
http://www.papyrusweb.ch/Syspinner/IBMHistoryOfFirsts.asp
there were a couple of MVS-based HSMs during the 80s that provided
support for other platforms (like crays, etc). One was out of LANL
(mvs managed the moving of data back & forth) that General Atomics
marketing as DataTree.
http://www.computer.org/conferences/mss95/wood/wood.htm
some number of things are referenced under IEEE MSS
Another was out of NCAR/UCAR that they attempted to productize as Mesa
Archival. for some reason one of the few references search engine found:
http://www.space-frontier.org/Projects/ExternalTanks/entrepreneurs/space_phoenix.htm
NASA Ames had something that they did Amdahl Unix.
LLNL had one on cray and we (out of the skunkworks that my wife and I
were doing that also produced HA/CMP) help fund productizing as
Unitree (it was take-off on the "datatree" ... but implying
unix-based):
http://www.sdsc.edu/projects/Systems_soft/UniTree/enhancements.html
http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SCD/Hardware/UniTree/
then there is reference to TSM that i recently cross-posted:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#52 HSM Functionality for Microsoft, using the Mainframe as the
where TSM was originally called ADSM ... which previously had been WSDF ... which evolved from an internal CMSBACK file backup/archive system that I had written in the late '70s and had been deployed at a number of internal datacenters
random past posts:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001.html#21 Disk caching and file systems. Disk history...people forget
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001.html#22 Disk caching and file systems. Disk history...people forget
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#66 commodity storage servers
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#66 Holy Satanism! Re: Hyper-Threading Technology - Intel information.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#3 IBM's "old" boss speaks (was "new")
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#4 Mainframers: Take back the light (spotlight, that is)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#46 What goes into a 3090?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#61 GE 625/635 Reference + Smart Hardware
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#29 Computers in Science Fiction
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#8 Avoiding JCL Space Abends
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#31 general networking is: DEC eNet: was Vnet : Unbelievable
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#25 Beyond 8+3
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#29 360/370 disk drives
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#31 360/370 disk drives
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#9 IBM says AMD dead in 5yrs ... -- Microsoft Monopoly vs. IBM
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#6 IBM says AMD dead in 5yrs ... -- Microsoft Monopoly vs. IBM
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Fix the shuttle or fly it unmanned ... Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 19:46:44 GMTCharles Shannon Hendrix writes:
you can have raid4 with all parity records on (the same) single drive ... which resultes in bottleneck on the parity drive ... basically constant performance regardless of the number of data drives. raid5 will rotate the drive with the parity record .... so aggregate performance doesn't tend to bottleneck on a single drive ... but is spread across all drives; however it is still approx. 1/4th the thruput of non-raid given distribution across the same number of drives (each write requires two reads and two writes).
possibly try search engine for raid5, raid6, raid10, etc; result
with pictures/diagrams:
http://www.1u-raid5.net/Differences/
http://www.lascon.co.uk/d008005.htm
a verbal description:
http://ftp.cs.umt.edu/u/wright/487/lect_html/7_1/7_1_5.html
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Offshore IT Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 20:25:56 GMTScott Jones writes:
there were some implications ...
one) that the avg. size of the subsidies and the percentage needing subsidy were increasing over time and
two) to have a subsidy implied that the money needed to come from somewhere (the value of somebody else's work needed to be much larger than what their benefits were) and possibly
three) some small nation state might attempt to attract all the high procedures (especially in the distance-insensitive knowledge work domain)
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 23:13:37 GMTCBFalconer writes:
slightly related:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#39 Why Use - ?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#36 So I tried this //vm.marist.edu stuff on a slow Sat. night,
the periodic days spent in bldg 90 was little more of a challenge
with strong head wind going both directions:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001b.html#68 weather biasing where engineers live (was Re: Disk power numbers)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#11 YKYGOW...
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#11 Home mainframes
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 23:19:58 GMTBrian Boutel writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: assembler performance superiority: a given Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 03:39:41 GMTnoone@nowhere.com (Steve Myers) writes:
we had pls, assembler, and rexx implementations (and i did a C version for port to aix).
numerous times there is so much time in assembler dealing with the
minutia that vision of the forest is lost. long ago and far away, i
was able to demonstrate ten times more function and ten times
performance by recoding one of the (assembler implemented) dump reader
products in interpreted rexx.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#dumprx
also note that luther finally got his radix tree stuff into the hardware
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#19 S/360 operating systems geneaology
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#73 Most complex instructions
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002d.html#18 Mainframers: Take back the light (spotlight, that is)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002q.html#10 radix sort
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003e.html#80 "Super-Cheap" Supercomputing
from pop ...
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DZ9AR004/A.7
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/DZ9ZR000/A.7?DT=20010102160855
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: grey-haired assembler programmers (Ritchie's C) Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 03:46:48 GMTjohn_w_gilmore@MSN.COM (john gilmore) writes:
question came up about this recently someplace else so repeat the posting ref (air force evaluation):
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#42 Thirty Years Later: Lessons from the Multics Security Evaluation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#43 another 30 year thing
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002l.html#44 Thirty Years Later: Lessons from the Multics Security Evaluation
... aka multics system implementation in pli supposedly never had a buffer overflow problem
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:36:03 GMTTrog Woolley writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:50:24 GMTjmfbahciv writes:
other issue was that foreign competition had reduced the cycle to 3
years (aka it was possible for foreign competition to react almost two
and half times faster to changing consumer habits than domestic
manufactures).
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#41 Reason Japanese cars are assembled in the US (was Re: American bigotry)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#43 Economic Factors on Automation
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Wireless security Newsgroups: sci.crypt Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 21:37:47 GMT"Andrew Swallow" writes:
random prev. ref:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000b.html#27 Tysons Corner, Virginia
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002d.html#11 Security Proportional to Risk (was: IBM Mainframe at home)
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: where to find X9.26 document? Newsgroups: comp.security.misc Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 03:39:21 GMT1053655692@noid.net (1053655692@noid.net) writes:
electronic standards store:
http://webstore.ansi.org/ansidocstore/
and do search on x9
notice x9.26 withdrawal ...
Withdrawal of x9.26
Recommended Action:
In its July, 1999 meeting, Working Group X9F3 responsible for the
maintenance of ANS X9.26, Financial Institution Sign-On Authentication
for Wholesale Financial Transactions, by unanimous vote recommends
that ANS X9.26 be withdrawn. This is a continuation of the action
taken by X9F in its last meeting when it recommended the withdrawal of
ANS X9.9 and ANS X9.23. ANS X9.26 is dependent on ANS X9.9 and X9.23
and is therefore an inappropriate standard to be used in the wholesale
financial environment based on the high average dollar value of
transactions.
Procedural Basis:
At its April meeting in 1999, the X9F subcommittee voted unanimously
(except for an abstention of one new member) to withdraw ANS X9.9 and
ANS X9.23. Subsequent to that meeting, the X9 Secretariat advised
ANSI to cease all sales (paper and ESS versions) of ANS X9.9 and ANS
X9.23. X9F3 also recommends the withdrawal of ANS X9.26 for the
reasons stated below.
Rational for this action:
Based on recent attacks on 56 bit symmetric encryption algorithms such
as the Data Encryption Algorithm (DEA), X9F at its April, 1999 meeting
decided to cease support for X9.9 and X9.23. ANSI has been advised to
stop selling these standards.
ANS X9.26 is also recommended for withdrawal based on the following:
1) ANS X9.26 is dependent on ANS X9.9 (MAC) for message authentication
and X9.23 for data encryption..
2) There is a well known attack on MACs used by ANS X9.26 based on the
availability of brute force equipment, such as the "DES cracker".
This attack is published in TG-24-1999, which is available in draft
form and will be made freely available on the X9 bookstore web site.
3) Given the existence of the above equipment, in the wholesale
environment with average transactions of millions of dollars, the use
of 56-bit keys is no longer a prudent business practice to be
continued. Financial Institutions need to plan to migrate away from
the use of any 56 bit symmetric encryption algorithm in the wholesale
business environment.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 13:31:24 GMTLars Poulsen writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 14:00:15 GMTjmfbahciv writes:
previous ref:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#43 Reason Japanese cars are assembled in the US (was Re: American bigotry)
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 15:49:02 GMThawk@slytherin.ds.psu.edu (Dr. Richard E. Hawkins) writes:
lots of other boyd references (scroll down for some that aren't even
mine:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subboyd.html#boyd
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Offshore IT Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:21:24 GMTCharles Richmond writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:15:26 GMThawk@slytherin.ds.psu.edu (Dr. Richard E. Hawkins) writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: IBM system 370 Newsgroups: comp.lang.asm370 Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:51:44 GMT"Bill Turner, WB4ALM" writes:
random adventure refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#52 Enter fonts (was Re: Unix case-sensitivity: how did it originate?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#83 "Adventure" (early '80s) who wrote it?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#169 Crowther (pre-Woods) "Colossal Cave"
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000b.html#72 Microsoft boss warns breakup could worsen virus problem
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#33 Adventure Games (Was: Navy orders supercomputer)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#14 adventure ... nearly 20 years
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001m.html#44 Call for folklore - was Re: So it's cyclical.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002d.html#12 Mainframers: Take back the light (spotlight, that is)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003f.html#46 Any DEC 340 Display System Doco ?
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A few Z990 Gee-Wiz stats Newsgroups: comp.arch Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 19:38:23 GMT"Stephen Fuld" writes:
i worked out the semantics that allowed a cached record to follow the lock. some number of people are/were apprehensive because the recovery/commit logs are node specific ... and recovery in fast commit scenario can be complicated i.e. local log record(s) has been written/commuted, but the record home location hasn't been rewritten ... and the working copy is floating around different node caches.
effectively with the fast interconnects ... the I/O & processor overhead moving the lock between nodes and moving the lock plus record between nodes was nearly identical. with the record accompanying the lock, then the complex starts to look much more like aggregate large distributed memory.
the alternative is that in the case of fast commits, the record home location has to be written before the lock is moved between nodes (and the destination node reads the record off disk). An intermediate step (addressing some of the recovery complexities) is to allow forcing the write of the record home location before the lock moves between nodes ... but transmits the record along with the lock ... at least saving the destination node having to reread the record off disk.
some of this originated when my wife did her stint in pok responsible for (mainframe) loosely coupled (i.e. cluster) architecture. Her Peer-Coupled Shared Data included low latency locking protocol ... but ran afoul policy that inter-machine communication was suppose to be SNA based (she fought and lost battle that trotter should be less like emulated ctca and more like real interprocessor communication).
random past Peer-Coupled Shared Data refs:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#35a Drive letters
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#37 What is MVS/ESA?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/98.html#40 Comparison Cluster vs SMP?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#71 High Availabilty on S/390
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#100 Why won't the AS/400 die? Or, It's 1999 why do I have to learn how to use
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#128 Examples of non-relational databases
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#13 Computer of the century
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#30 OT?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000f.html#37 OT?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001b.html#73 7090 vs. 7094 etc.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001c.html#69 Wheeler and Wheeler
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#71 Pentium 4 Prefetch engine?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#2 Block oriented I/O over IP
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#44 The Alpha/IA64 Hybrid
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001g.html#46 The Alpha/IA64 Hybrid
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#76 Other oddball IBM System 360's ?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#23 OT - Internet Explorer V6.0
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#54 Computer Naming Conventions
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#6 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002g.html#48 Why did OSI fail compared with TCP-IP?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002h.html#12 Why did OSI fail compared with TCP-IP?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002j.html#45 M$ SMP and old time IBM's LCMP
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#68 META: Newsgroup cliques?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#67 unix
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#9 Why did TCP become popular ?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#31 OT What movies have taught us about Computers
various past discussions of distributed locking, fast commits,
recovery, etc.
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#64 distributed locking patents
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001.html#40 Disk drive behavior
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001c.html#66 KI-10 vs. IBM at Rutgers
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001e.html#2 Block oriented I/O over IP
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#22 Early AIX including AIX/370
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#21 3745 and SNI
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001i.html#30 IBM OS Timeline?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#17 I hate Compaq
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001j.html#47 OT - Internet Explorer V6.0
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#5 OT - Internet Explorer V6.0
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001k.html#18 HP-UX will not be ported to Alpha (no surprise)exit
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#5 mainframe question
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#8 mainframe question
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001l.html#17 mainframe question
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#23 Alpha vs. Itanic: facts vs. FUD
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002.html#36 a.f.c history checkup... (was What specifications will the standard year 2001 PC have?)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#36 windows XP and HAL: The CP/M way still works in 2002
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#37 Poor Man's clustering idea
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002d.html#31 2 questions: diag 68 and calling convention
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002e.html#67 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#1 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002f.html#17 Blade architectures
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#8 Avoiding JCL Space Abends
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002m.html#21 Original K & R C Compilers
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002n.html#27 why does wait state exist?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002o.html#14 Home mainframes
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003c.html#53 HASP assembly: What the heck is an MVT ABEND 422?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#2 IBM says AMD dead in 5yrs ... -- Microsoft Monopoly vs. IBM
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#8 IBM says AMD dead in 5yrs ... -- Microsoft Monopoly vs. IBM
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003d.html#54 Filesystems
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#35 UNIX on LINUX on VM/ESA or z/VM
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Offshore IT Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 21:17:09 GMTCharles Richmond writes:
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A few Z990 Gee-Wiz stats Newsgroups: comp.arch Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 14:57:42 GMTpg_nh@sabi.Clara.co.UK (Piercarlo Grandi) writes:
slightly related:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003b.html#7 Disk drives as commodities.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Computer resources, past, present, and future. Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:02:09 GMTbdc@world.std.com (Brian 'Jarai' Chase) writes:
so each terminal connection could have multiple different logical sessions to different systems.
about 20 years ago, got a pc with 3270 terminal emulator which could have multiple logical sessions and could switch between local window on the pc (say borland's tinycalc) and various 3270 sessions.
for past couple years, i've had two 21in screen, two keyboards, and two mouse ... side for side ... one going to an NT system and one going to linux system. about a month ago ... i got a switcher cable that supports single screen, keyboard, and mouse ... and uses scroll lock to toggle between the linux and nt systems.
I can have two windows per screen each window with 2-3 times as many lines as the 3270 screen ... and i have graphics background when i've minimized a window. i run close to the same environment on both linux & nt .... same browser, similar email, same usenet interface, both internet connected, etc.
the keyboard interface has had almost no changes in 35 years.
the gml i used over 30 years ago supported the embedding of other gml
files (have common start, end, top, bottom, and whatever other common
things i wanted across a collection of files). html i use today
doesn't support embedding other html files. for instance, in the rfc
index:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
the current 3500-some RFC summaries are partitioned in html files #0-#11 ... i repeat the header and trailer in each file ... while 30 years ago ... I could just imbed them.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: How to increase the Swap drive size Newsgroups: linux.redhat.misc Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 03:26:39 GMT"Dave Griffiths" writes:
since one of the swap partitions had nothing behind it ... i decided to increase it from 512m to 1.5g (resulting in 2gig total).
... start
/sbin/sfdisk -l
/sbin/swapoff /dev/sda5
/sbin/swapon -s
/sbin/parted /dev/sda
print
rm 5
mkpartfs logical linux-swap <start> <end>
print
quit
/sbin/mkswap /dev/sda5
/sbin/swapon /dev/sda5
/sbin/swapon -s
/sbin/sfdisk -l
... end
check man pages for sfdisk, swapoff, swapon, and parted. parted especially warns about being very careful of what you type. basically "<start>" was original start for the original partition and "<end>" was enuf added cylinders to be 1.5gig instead of .5gig.
since i recreated the same swap partition only larger ... /etc/fstab didn't have to change.
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 15:04:51 GMT"J. Clarke" writes:
in the early '70s ... there weren't any american hotels in the area. use to be put up in a small traveling businessman hotel in a residential neighborhood where there was very little english.
over the years some number of other hitech companies sprouted up in
the area and some number of american hotel chains appeared, although
i don't seen any here:
http://www.bestlodging.com/cities/germany-boeblingen.shtml
misc. mercedes:
http://www.autointell.com/nao_companies/daimlerchrysler/mercedes/mercedes-smart-01.htm
http://www.stuttgart-tourist.de/english/stuttgart/museums/benzmuseum.html
http://www.benzworld.org/
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Columbia U Computing History - New stuff Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.protocols.kermit.misc Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 15:16:45 GMTJoe Morris writes:
and somewhat aside june 10th is the 20th anniversity of the 1000th node on the internal network.
copy of the original 1000th node distribution update:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/99.html#112 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/internet.htm#22 OS/360 names and error codes (was: Humorous and/or Interesting Opcodes)
random other:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001n.html#12 Author seeks help - net in 1981
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002k.html#26 DEC eNet: was Vnet : Unbelievable
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#18 Multiple layers of virtual address translation
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003g.html#51 vnet 1000th node anniversary 6/10
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003h.html#16 Why did TCP become popular ?
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#27 instant messaging
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2003i.html#32 A Dark Day
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 22:44:26 GMT"Helmut P. Einfalt" writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: TGV in the USA? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 16:44:47 GMThawk@slytherin.ds.psu.edu (Dr. Richard E. Hawkins) writes:
apparently new tollroad ... instead of booths has video cameras that read the plate and then people watch the tape and key in the plate, which eventually results in sending bills out at the end of the month. i guess it is suppose to be more efficient than having the people in toll booths (both for the drivers and the workers).
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: IBM 5100 Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 20:31:56 GMTarchmage@sfchat.org (Nate Edel) writes:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#69 APL on PalmOS ???
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000.html#70 APL on PalmOS ???
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#15 APL version in IBM 5100 (Was: Resurrecting the IBM 1130)
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#39 IBM 5100 [Was: First DESKTOP Unix Box?]
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#43 IBM 5100 [Was: First DESKTOP Unix Box?]
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#45 IBM 5100 [Was: First DESKTOP Unix Box?]
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#47 IBM 5100 [Was: First DESKTOP Unix Box?]
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2002b.html#64 ... the need for a Museum of Computer Software
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Whatever happened to 'University Computer Centers'? Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 16:03:31 GMT"Rupert Pigott" writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Offshore IT Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 18:54:35 GMTRobert Pluim writes:
i've been claiming that the wedge started with very significant numbers of highly skilled foreign workers over here ... in part because US wasn't turning out enuf by itself. with the significant training and contacts made by the foreign workers ... it significanlty aided being able to migrate the work "back home".
misc older stories:
http://www.computerworld.com/news/1998/story/0,11280,34704,00.html
http://www.computerworld.com/news/1998/story/0,11280,33164,00.html
http://www.computerworld.com/news/1998/story/0,11280,26785,00.html
and a more recent one:
http://www.computerworld.com/careertopics/careers/story/0,10801,80665,00.html
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: IBM 5100 Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 23:53:26 GMT"Russ Holsclaw" writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: A Dark Day... Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp10,alt.folklore.computers,comp.arch,comp.lang.asm370 Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 14:22:57 GMTime@panix.com (Randy Hudson) writes:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: IBM 5100 Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 15:09:11 GMTCharles Richmond writes:
the precursor to 5100/palm was scamp which emulated 1130 and
ran apl\1130 .... also url from above
http://wwwcsif.cs.ucdavis.edu/~csclub/museum/items/merk_8_ibm_5100.html
as per previous exchange we had:
https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2000d.html#15
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Re: Offshore IT Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 15:15:12 GMT"Offshoare Outsourcing Threatens Offshore Outsourcing" thread from slashdot:
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Subject: Virtual Machines for Security Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 15:26:07 GMTVirtual Machines for Security thread from Slashdot:
and in the thread
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=66724&cid=6133870
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=66724&cid=6136455
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler | https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv https://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm